Los Angeles County Erroneously Claims the Justice Party has no Registered Members

On January 31, California elections officials released new registration data for each qualified party, and also for each political body. In California, a “political body” is a group that has told the Secretary of State that it is trying to qualify. The Justice Party was and is a political body, but Los Angeles County did not follow correct procedures, and reported “zero” members of the Justice Party. The Justice Party does have registered voters in Los Angeles County. The party has complained, but the county, so far, has said it is too much work to find the people who are registered in the Justice Party, because they are now in the computer as independent voters and someone would need to physically examine all the voters coded as independents to find the Justice Party members.

Alabama State Court Judge Will Run for Re-Election as an Independent Candidate

According to this story, Howard Hawk, Presiding Circuit Judge for Marshall County, Alabama, will run for re-election this year as an independent candidate. Alabama elects its state judges in partisan elections. Hawk filed for the Republican primary but the county party rejected him. Alabama law lets political parties block candidates from running in their primaries for any reason. Republican legislative leaders had welcomed Hawk into the Republican Party, but the Marshall County Republican Party distrusts him because he was a Democrat until mid-2011. Alabama does not have registration by party, and has open primaries.

Oregon Special U.S. House Results

On January 31, Oregon held a special election to fill the vacant U.S. House seat, First District. The unofficial results: Suzanne Bonamici, Democrat, 53.96%; Rob Cornilles, Republican, 39.65%; Steven Reynolds, Progressive, 3.23%; James Foster, Libertarian, 3.16%.

In November 2010, the results for this same seat had been: Democratic 54.82%; Republican 42.00%; Constitution 1.32%; Green/Progressive 1.01%; Libertarian .85%.

Deaborn, Michigan, Must Pay Attorneys Fees of $103,402 in Sidewalk Leafleting Case

On January 27, a U.S. Magistrate Judge in Detroit awarded attorneys’ fees of $103,401.96 to the plaintiffs in Saieg v City of Dearborn. The issue had been whether the city could ban leafleting on public sidewalks during the Arab International Festival, a large annual event that usually attracts 250,000 people. The 6th circuit had ruled on May 26, 2011 that the city’s ban on letting individuals hand out leaflets on the public sidewalks at or near the event is unconstitutional. The 6th circuit was 2-1, and the city did not appeal.

The plaintiffs had wanted to hand out leaflets that attempt to persuade Arabs who are not already Christian to consider becoming Christian. The city had said the plaintiffs were free to have a booth at the festival, but the plaintiffs found that unsatisfactory because they said social pressure at the festival prevented the vast majority of Muslim attendees from approaching the booth. Thanks to Eric Dondero for this news.

Democratic National Committee Says Randall Terry Should Not be Considered a Bona Fide Candidate for Broadcast Purposes

Randall Terry is a long-time opponent of legal abortion. He has gained a place on the Democratic presidential primary ballot in some states this year. Generally he is on the ballot in states which require a filing fee as the only condition for being on the ballot. He is also an official write-in candidate in certain other Democratic presidential primaries.

As a candidate, federal law protects his right to buy advertising on broadcast media, and that media cannot refuse to sell him time if he can afford it. Also the media cannot censor his message. However, on January 27, the Democratic National Committee declared in this letter that Terry is not a bona fide Democrat, and therefore he should not be allowed the normal rights relating to broadcast media that other candidates receive. Terry wants to air television advertising during the Super Bowl. One television station has already refused, based on the letter from the Democratic National Committee.

This issue gets to the heart of the same issue that is involved with the Rosaland Kurita case in Tennessee, which is pending in the 6th circuit. In 2008 the Tennessee Democratic Party would not recognize Kurita as its nominee for State Senate, even though she had won the primary. How much control does the U.S. Constitution give to political parties over their own nomination process? The U.S. Supreme Court has given the nation conflicting opinions. Thanks to Bill Van Allen for this news.