Virginia Investigating Possible Forged Signatures on Newt Gingrich’s Ballot Access Petition

Brad Blog has this story, which says Virginia law enforcement officials are looking into the possibility that a petitioner for Newt Gingrich may have forged names on petitions. It seems somewhat likely that no such investigation would now be occurring if Gingrich himself had not told an Iowa voter in public that “one guy” who worked on his petition submitted 1,500 fraudulent signatures. Thanks to IndependentPoliticalReport for the link.

The Brad Blog story also talks about whether Mitt Romney was improperly registered to vote in Massachusetts in January 2010, when he voted in the special U.S. Senate election.

Illinois League of Women Voters Asks U.S. Supreme Court to Hear its Case Against Gerrymandering

On January 30, the Illinois League of Women Voters asked the U.S. Supreme Court to hear League of Women Voters of Illinois v Quinn. The issue is whether partisan gerrymandering violates the free speech portion of the First Amendment. Here is the League’s filing with the U.S. Supreme Court.

The U.S. Supreme Court has refused to rule that partisan gerrymandering violates the Equal Protection part of the Fourteenth amendment, but this is the first case to argue that putting voters in a particular district based on their party membership violates the First Amendment. The League says that putting voters into certain districts based on their party membership makes it less likely that voters will hear certain kinds of speech. The First Amendment protects the ability to hear speech as well as the ability to speak.

The case doesn’t have a docket number in the U.S. Supreme Court yet. A 3-judge U.S. District Court in Illinois had rejected the case last year. The League had then asked for reconsideration on November 10, 2011, but the 3-judge court rejected that only six days later. Thanks to Rick Hasen for this news.

West Virginia Secretary of State Puts Republican on Primary Ballot After he Threatened to Sue

The West Virginia Secretary of State has put Frank Deem on the Republican primary ballot, for State Senate, 3rd district, after first having told him he could not appear on that ballot. See this story, which was written before the Secretary of State put him on the ballot. The primary is May 8.

West Virginia has multi-member State Senate districts. When a Senate district has two Senators, one is up for election in presidential years, and the other is up in mid-term years. The West Virginia Constitution says when a Senate district is composed of several counties, no more than one resident of any particular county may serve. The Secretary of State originally rejected Deem because the 3rd State Senate district already has one Senator from the county that Deem lives in. Deem argues that the state Constitution violates the U.S. Constitution, and apparently his argument was convincing enough to persuade the Secretary of State to let him run. No Democrat filed in the 3rd district, so if Deem wins his primary, he is virtually certain to be elected, and then the issue may go to court. Thanks to Bill Van Allen for the link.

Virginia Hires an Outside Attorney to Fight the Attorney General in Redistricting Lawsuit

According to this story, the Virginia Attorney General has hired an outside attorney to defend a lower state court ruling that invalidated the legislature’s redistricting plan. The Virginia Attorney General has asked the Virginia Supreme Court to reverse the lower court. But because the Virginia Constitution requires the state to defend decisions of the state courts, at least in some instances, the state felt obliged to provide legal representation for both sides. The lawsuit involves the U.S. House district boundaries.

New York Times Story on Ballot Access for Presidential Candidates in France

The New York Times of January 31 has this story about the requirement that presidential candidates in France need 500 signatures of mayors or other local officials in order to get on the ballot. France has tens of thousands of places that have their own mayor. However, the requirement is proving difficult to meet ever since the law was changed, to make the petition signatures available to the public. In the past, many small-town mayors have taken the position that they would sign for any presidential candidate, whether they agree with the candidate or not, because they favor inclusive ballot access. But, with the petitions now public, some presidential candidates are having a tougher time gathering the signatures.

The petition is due March 16. Presidential elections in France commonly have between ten and fifteen candidates on the ballot. Thanks to Jerry Kunz for the link.