Missouri Election Law Bills

Besides the Missouri election law bill mentioned in the preceding post, several other interesting election law bills are pending in the Missouri legislature. HB 1183, by Representative Mark Parkinson, a Republican, would cancel the Missouri presidential primary now set for February 7. The bill was introduced on January 5, but the fact that it has not made any headway at all shows that it has no chance of passing. If it were being taken seriously, it should already have passed. The rationale for the bill is that the Missouri Republican 2012 presidential primary is just a “beauty contest” and Republicans choose their delegates to the national convention in caucuses in March. Of course if the bill had passed, it would also have canceled the Democratic, Constitution and Libertarian presidential primaries. Thanks to Josh Putnam of Frontloading HQ for news of this bill.

Representative Mike Colona, a Democrat, has introduced HB 1415, to restore the straight-ticket device to Missouri general election ballots.

Representative Tony Dugger, a Republican, has introduced HB 1036, which provides that general election ballots would no longer carry a party logo for any party. A “party logo” is a cartoon-like drawing showing the emblem of each party. The bill’s author introduced the bill at the request of county election officials. They say that some voters draw a circle around one party’s logo, and then leave the remainder of the ballot blank. Election officials guess that such voters think the logo is a straight-ticket device, but in reality they are just depositing a blank ballot. Removing the logo should cure the confusion. The bill has already passed the House Elections Committee and has a hearing in the House Rules Committee on January 30.

Missouri Bill Introduced to Eliminate Need for Minor Party Petitions to Carry a Slate of Presidential Elector Candidates

On January 10, four Missouri state representatives introduced HB 1236, which deletes the accidental error in the 1993 ballot access reform bill that requires party petitions to include the names of presidential elector candidates. In general, the Missouri petition to qualify a new party for the ballot does not carry the names of any nominees. The party submits the names of its nominees, for public office generally, after the petition has been circulated.

But due to a drafting error in the law, made in 1993, the law still says the party petition has to list candidates for presidential elector. The bill would fix the error. The bill is sponsored by Republican representatives Sue Entlicher, Tony Dugger, John Diehl, and Democratic representative Jill Schupp.

U.S. District Court Judge Chooses June 26 for New York’s Congressional Primary

On January 27, a U.S. District Court Judge in Albany, New York, issued an opinion, setting the date of New York’s 2012 primary for congressional office on the fourth Tuesday of June, which will be June 26 in 2012. The state is free to decide whether to move its primary for state and local office to that date, or to leave it in September. The case is U.S.A. v State of New York, 1:10-cv-1214.

The basis for the decision is that a June date better protects the interest of overseas absentee ballots. The deadline for candidates running in a congressional primary to submit petitions will be April 26. The state hasn’t even drawn the U.S. House district boundaries. It is now somewhat plausible that the legislature will ease the petitioning burden for primary candidates, at least for 2012. Thanks to Tony Roza for this news.

Decision on Georgia Presidential Qualifications Expected by February 3

On January 27, the Administrative Law Judge who is hearing the challenge to President Obama’s spot on the Georgia Democratic presidential primary asked that post-trial briefs be submitted by Wednesday, February 1. Previously the deadline for such briefs had been February 5. It is expected that the Administrative Law Judge will then rule by February 3. Thanks to Bill Van Allen for this news.

U.S. District Court Suspends Some Texas Election Deadlines

On January 27, a 3-judge U.S. District Court in San Antonio that is hearing the redistricting lawsuit held a status conference that lasted seven hours. At the conclusion, the judges said that if the plaintiffs and the defendants can agree on new district boundaries for U.S. House and legislature by February 6, then the April 3 primary can proceed. Otherwise, it will be postponed.

In the meantime, the deadline for candidates to file for the primary will be re-opened, but when it will be re-opened is not determined. Previously there had been an agreement that it would re-open February 1, but that date is now defunct and the new date will be settled later.