U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., Upholds Federal Voting Rights Act

On December 22, U.S. District Court Judge John D. Bates upheld section five of the federal Voting Rights Act, in a 96-page opinion. The case is LaRoque v Holder, 10-0561. The case started after the voters of Kinston, North Carolina, voted to switch the city’s elections from partisan to non-partisan elections, and then the Voting Rights Section of the U.S. Justice Department refused to allow that change. The Justice Department felt the change would injure black voters. The city council of Kinston refused to challenge the Justice Department’s decision.

Proponents of non-partisan elections then sued to overturn Section Five of the Voting Rights Act. Originally Judge Bates said they lacked standing, but the U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit, had reversed that, so the case returned to Judge Bates, who has now upheld the act. Even though the decision is very long, it doesn’t actually discuss the merits of the particular controversy in Kinston over non-partisan elections versus partisan elections, and whether the proposed change affects blacks. Instead, the decision is all about the big issue of whether Congress had the authority to extend the Act in 2006. Thanks to Rick Hasen for the link.

Newt Gingrich Says He is Submitting At Least14,000 Signatures for Virginia Republican Presidential Primary

The petition deadline for candidates seeking a place on the Virginia Republican presidential primary is today. The State Board of Elections will remain open somewhat later than usual today, because some Republican presidential candidates haven’t filed yet, and may be filing at the very last minute. The requirement is 10,000 signatures, the toughest mandatory presidential primary requirement of any state. The petition must include at least 400 signatures from each U.S. House district. Any registered voter may sign.

Newt Gingrich told the press that he will submit at least 14,000 signatures, and maybe as many as 15,000. See this story.

Traditionally, presidential primary petitions are not checked for validity. An independent candidate in Virginia is suing over the policy that says general election petitions are checked for validity, whereas primary petitions are deemed to be sufficient.

Maine Lawsuit on Anonymous Bloggers Involved with Campaigns Makes News

In 2010, an anonymous blog came into existence in Maine, in connection with the gubernatorial general election. The web site, called “The Cutler Files”, posted derogatory information about Eliot Cutler, an independent candidate for Governor who was almost elected. Later, the Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics fined the blogger, Dennis Bailey, $200 for failing to disclose that he was the author of the blog. Bailey then sued the Commission, arguing that the U.S. Constitution protects anonymous speech about political campaigns. He filed his lawsuit in state court, but it was quickly removed to federal court. In federal court, the case is Bailey v State of Maine Commission on Government Ethics, 1:11-cv-00179-JAW.

The case is far from being resolved. However, on December 19, the federal magistrate hearing the case ruled that certain confidential documents and e-mails involved in the case may be made public. These include evidence that the blogger was working with one of the Democratic candidates for Governor, Rosa Scarcelli, when he set up the blog. See this story.

Link to the Texas Secretary of State’s Form for Unqualified Parties to Notify the State that they Intend to Petition in 2012

Texas has a unique law which requires parties that intend to qualify by petition to notify the state that they intend to do that. The intention form is due January 2, 2012. Here is a link to the form.

The requirement discriminates against parties that are formed in the spring of election years, because by then it is too late to complete the form. If Texas had had a law like this in 1912, Theodore Roosevelt could not have put his new Progressive Party on the ballot, because even the idea for the party did not occur to Roosevelt until after Roosevelt failed to get the Republican presidential nomination in June 1912. Similarly, Strom Thurmond and his States Rights Party did get on the ballot in Texas in 1948, because Texas did not have this law back then. Thurmond’s party was not created until July 1948.

The law was passed in 1993 and has never been challenged in court. There is no election administration-related need for the form, because a party can’t begin to petition until after the primary anyway. in 2012 a party can’t begin to petition until April. If a new party were formed in the spring of 2012 that had not existed as of January 2, 2012, it would seem to be in a position to challenge the law, especially as applied to a presidential election.

The last time that a new party was formed in the United States in the election year itself, and which proved to have a fairly strong ability to get on ballots, was the Natural Law Party. It was formed in April 1992. Of course, the Texas law didn’t exist that year. Since the formation of the Natural Law Party in 1992, all the new parties formed in the U.S., and which had any heft, have been formed in the odd years before the election.

Libertarian Party News for December 2011 of Special Interest for Those Interested in History

The Libertarian Party News, December 2011 issue, is especially interesting for those interested in political history. The 16-page issue has a compilation by Arthur DiBianca showing instances when Libertarian Party nominees in partisan elections either won, or out-polled one of their major party opponents. The issue also has an extensive summary of Libertarian Party history, by calendar year. This historical emphasis is to mark the party’s anniversary, of 40 years of existence.

The only other nationally-organized political parties in the United States that have existed for at least 40 years, and which were electorally active for at least that long, have been these parties: Prohibition, Socialist Labor, Socialist, Communist, and Socialist Workers.