Four South Carolina Counties Ask State Supreme Court to Stop Republican Presidential Primary Unless Party Covers All Costs

On October 17, four South Carolina counties asked the State Supreme Court to rule that the Republican presidential primary cannot go forward unless the counties are relieved of paying any of the election-administration related expenses. The case is Beaufort County v South Carolina Election Commission. The other plaintiffs are Chester, Greenville and Spartanburg Counties. The Republican Party was already paying for approximately half the expenses. See this story. The State Supreme Court has discretion on whether or not to hear this case, and has not yet even assigned a case number. UPDATE: here is the brief. It is very long because of all the exhibits.

Independent Legislative Candidate in Virginia Complains about Disparity in Validation for Primary Petitions versus General Election Petitions

In Virginia, and Indiana, candidates who petition for a spot on a general election ballot have their signatures checked for validity, by government elections officials. But candidates seeking a spot on a partisan primary ballot are treated more leniently. Their petitions are given to their own political party, and political party officials merely look at the petitions to see if, on the surface, they contain enough signatures.

Michael Osborne, an independent candidate in this year’s legislative election in Virginia, is upset about the disparity, and is threatening to bring a lawsuit, although it is far too late for that to effect the November 8, 2011 ballot. In any event, the only possible lawsuit would be one that alleges the disparity is unconstitutional. No Virginia statute has been broken; the statutes provide for different treatment for the different types of petition. See this story.

Greens Almost Win Massachusetts Legislative Seat

On October 18, Massachusetts and Minnesota both held special legislative elections. In the Massachusetts State House race (Berkshire Third District), Green Party nominee Mark C. Miller came close to winning. The Massachusetts Secretary of State’s office does not supply semi-official returns on election night. Unofficial returns reported in the press differ with each other. Some sources say Miller lost by only 92 votes, and some say he lost by 192 votes. He placed second, with either 30% or 32% of the total. The winning Democrat, Tricia Farley-Bouvier, polled 33%. The independent in the race, Pam Malumphy, received 22%, and the Republican nominee, Mark Jester, received 15%.

In Minnesota, in a Minneapolis State House district, the Green Party nominee also placed second. Farheen Hakeem received 22%; Democratic-Farmer-Labor nominee Jeff Hayden won with 68%; Republican nominee Bruce Lundeen received 8%; and Independence Party nominee Matt Brillhart received 2%. Thanks to Uncovered Politics for this news.

Two Washington Post Writers, Matt Miller and Ezra Klein, Debate Usefulness of a Major New Political Party

Ezra Klein and Matt Miller discuss whether or not a new major political party in the United States would be beneficial, in this post on Ezra Klein’s blog. Both are writers for the Washington Post. Klein does not support the idea of a new party, but Miller does.

Ezra Klein suggests that when Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger was elected in California, that was the same type of event as the election of a third party president. His example is not convincing. If Schwarzenegger had run as an independent and been elected, his years in office would have been far different. But, he was elected as a Republican, which did not shake up California at all. California has had many Republican Governors in the past 30 years. In fact, California has had Republican Governors for 23 of the last 29 years. The last time California had a third party Governor, California politics did get shaken up. The last California third party Governor was Hiram Johnson, elected as the Progressive Party nominee in 1914.