U.S. District Court Will Hold Trial in Case Over Whether South Carolina Republican Party May Bar Non-Republicans from its Primaries

U.S. District Court Judge J. Michelle Childs will hold a trial in Greenville County Republican Party v State of South Carolina, 6:10-cv-1407. The trial is set for August 1, 2012, almost a year away. In the meantime, both sides will identify expert witnesses and conduct discovery. Because this case will take so long to reach a decision, the status quo will prevail for the 2012 presidential primary. All voters will be able to vote in the 2012 Republican presidential primary, even though the party, not the taxpayers, is paying for administration of the primary.

Arizona Supreme Court Accepts Case on Validity of Recall Petition

On August 31, the Arizona Supreme Court agreed to hear the case over the validity of petitions to recall State Senate President Russell Pearce. See this story. The lower court had agreed that the petition is valid. If the State Supreme Court agrees with the lower court, Arizona will then hold its first recall for a state legislator. Senator Pearce does not contest the point that the recall petition was signed by a sufficient number of registered voters, but his lawsuit focuses on technical deficiencies concerning the petition.

The Arizona Supreme Court still hasn’t decided whether to hear another election law case, the one over whether the state has the authority to tell Tucson that the city must use non-partisan elections. In the State Supreme Court, that case is State of Arizona v City of Tucson, cv11-0150-pr.

Mayor Bloomberg Will Testify in Criminal Trial Involving Funds Channelled Through Independence Party

The New York Post reports that Mayor Michael Bloomberg will be a witness in the trial that opens September 12, in the matter of the money that Bloomberg contributed to the Independence Party and which the Independence Party then passed on to John Haggerty. Haggerty was to use the money to help the Bloomberg re-election campaign in 2009, but according to the indictment, he did not use the money on the campaign, but diverted it to his own use. Thanks to the Independent View for the link.

Arizona Republic Columnist Thinks Arizona Lawsuit Against Voting Rights Act May Win

Robert Robb, columnist for the Arizona Republic, the daily newspaper of Phoenix, writes here that Arizona has a good chance of winning its recently filed lawsuit against part of the federal Voting Rights Act. The case, filed last week, is State of Arizona v Holder, U.S. District Court, Washington D.C., 11-1559. It has been assigned to U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson, an Obama appointee. It argues that the pre-clearance parts of the Act are unconstitutional. The law has been upheld many times in the past, but past precedents may no longer control, as the column explains.

Americans Elect Web Page Posts New National Signature Count

During the early summer of 2011, the Americans Elect web page posted a new national signature count for its various statewide petitions every week. This national total represented the sum of how many signatures had been collected around the nation on its various state petitions. But the July 28 posting of 1,747,557 had not been increased since then, during August. But on August 30 the web page showed a new national total, 1,755,707, an increase of only 8,150 signatures during August.