New York Legislative Candidate Wins Legal Fight over Residency, Even Though he was Registered to Vote in Massachusetts

On August 3, Patrick Manning won a lawsuit in New York Supreme Court, retaining his spot on the Republican primary ballot as a candidate for Assembly. New York requires legislative candidates to have lived in New York for the preceding five years. Manning’s ballot status was challenged on the grounds that he had been registered to vote at his vacation home in Massachusetts during that period. However, the Court found that Manning was a resident of New York during the entire period. See this story. Thanks to Bill Van Allen for the link.

U.S. District Court Will Hear Case on Who Can Qualify as an Independent Candidate in Ohio

On August 6, U.S. District Court Judge George C. Smith, a Reagan appointee, will hear Jolivette v Husted, southern district, 2:12-cv-603. Greg Jolivette submitted enough valid signatures to be on the November ballot as an independent candidate for State House, 51st district. Election officials still kept him off the ballot, because they say he was too recently a member of the Republican Party.

Ohio laws on who may qualify as an independent candidate are the vaguest laws in the U.S. Ohio does not have partisan registration. However, elections officials keep track of which party’s primary ballot a voter chooses. Jolivette did not vote in the Republican primary of March, 2012. But in 2011, he held himself out as a Republican and even started to petition onto the Republican primary ballot, but he then withdrew that Republican petition.

Ohio election law does not say an independent candidate must have had nothing to do with a political party. It just bans “sore losers”. Jolivette argues not only that he qualifies as an independent, but that in any event the law is hopelessly vague. See this story about the case. Thanks to Rick Hasen for the link.

Arizona Superior Court Hears Oral Arguments on Whether Top-Two Open Primary Initiative Should be on Ballot

Here is a description of the court hearing held August 3 in Phoenix, over whether the initiative for a top-two open primary should be on the ballot. Opponents argued that it violates the single-subject rule. The only argument on the single-subject rule that seemed to give the judge pause is the point that the initiative unnecessarily abolishes elections for party office. The very last paragraph of the article mentions this.

The other states with top-two open primaries, Washington, California, and Louisiana, all continue to hold elections for party office.

Final Brief Filed in Vermont Ballot Access on Petition-Checking Procedures

On August 3, Rocky Anderson and the Justice Party filed their reply brief in Vermont lower state court, in Anderson v State of Vermont. The issue is whether a petitioning candidate should be kept off the November ballot, not because he didn’t obtain enough valid signatures, and not that he didn’t submit them in time, but because some town clerks didn’t check the petitions quickly. This reply brief goes beyond just technical issues and is an interesting read.