Cornel West Wins Michigan Ballot Access Case

On Saturday, August 24, the Michigan Court of Claims issued opinion and order in West v Michigan Secretary of State, 24-000134-MB.  It says that independent candidates do not need to file an affidavit of identity, and therefore there is no basis to invalidate Cornel West’s independent candidacy.

The Secretary of State had invalidated West’s ballot position because of notary problems with the affidavit, but the court has determined that he didn’t even need to file that document

The state hasn’t checked the validity of West’s petition, but he turned in so many signatures, it is extremely likely that he has enough.

All Briefs Filed in Federal Illinois Ballot Access Case

As has been previously reported, on August 9 the Robert F.. Kennedy, Jr. campaign, and the Illinois Libertarian Party filed a federal lawsuit in Illinois to stop the petition challenges to the two presidential candidates.  The objectors didn’t name or serve the individual candidates for presidential elector.  The federal lawsuit argues that because the true candidates are the presidential elector candidates, the objections should be invalid.  The lawsuit also challenged the Illinois law that doesn’t permit circulators to work on an independent or minor party petition if they had earlier that same year worked on a primary petition for a Republican or Democratic candidate.

On August 23, the last brief was filed, so the case is ripe for a decision.  The plaintiffs’ reply brief is focused on the part of the case that doesn’t permit circulators to work on general election petitions if they had worked on primary election petitions.  This part of the case is especially salient now that the State Board has even extended the prohibition to work done outside of Illinois.

California Legislature Passes Bill Allowing Primary Candidates for Non-statewide Office to Withdraw

California has long been the only state that bans all candidate withdrawals.  This policy has been in effect since 1917.  However, on August 22, the legislature unanimously passed AB 1784, which permits candidates in primaries (for non-statewide office) to withdraw during the filing period.  The bill also prohibits anyone from filing for two public offices in that same primary.  Thanks to Eric Wong for this news.

The bill has not been signed yet, but it seems obvious that it will be signed.  No legislator voted against it and no one testified against it.  The bill does not apply to the statewide state offices, nor to U.S. Senator.

Illinois State Board of Elections Says that Circulators Who Worked for a Republican or Democratic Candidate in Another State Can’t Circulate for an Independent in Illinois

On August 23, a hearings officer for the Illinois State Board of Elections ruled that petitioners who circulate for a Democratic or Republican candidate in another state are not eligible to circulate an independent or minor party petition in Illinois that same year.  But, circulators who worked on an independent or minor party petition in another state can then work on an independent or minor party petition in Illinois that same year.

No other state tries to prevent a circulator from working because of that circulator’s activity in another state the same year.  Petitioning is First Amendment activity, and the ruling begs for a lawsuit to overturn it.  But because the hearings officer also determined that the petition at issue, the Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. independent petition, still has enough valid signatures, there will be no  lawsuit this year.

The hearings officer ruled that Kennedy has 33,286 valid signatures, which is more than the required 25,000.  Many of Kennedy’s Illinois petitioners had worked for him in other states, and so their work was valid.  A smaller number of signatures which had been gathered by Kennedy’s Illinois petitioners in other states this year for various Democratic and Republican presidential primary petitions are not valid.

Here is the report of the hearings officer.

Here is the appendix to the report, which contains the conclusion that some type of out-of-state work doesn’t matter, but other types do matter.  The Appendix says on page 40 that the fact that Kennedy was registered as a Democrat in New York does not disqualify him from being an independent candidate in Illinois.  On pages 74-76, it says that the fact that he may have given a false address does not disqualify his petitions, because the address was not sworn to.  On page 78 it says the fact that Kennedy is a minor party nominee in certain states does not disqualify him from being an independent candidate in Illinois.

Nevada State Court Hearing on Challenge to Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Petition

On August 23, a Nevada state trial court held a hearing in Rockefeller v Aguilar, Carson City District Court 24OC-00107.  This is the case in which a Democratic Party activist is suing the Secretary of State to remove Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., from the ballot.

The Secretary of State had determined that the petition has enough valid signatures.  The lawsuit charges that Kennedy is ineligible because he was a registered Democrat, and also that he can’t be an independent candidate in Nevada because he is the nominee of some one-state minor parties elsewhere in the nation.  Both of these claims are entirely without merit.  No presidential candidate has ever been removed from a general election ballot on the grounds of how he or she was registered.  John Anderson was affiliated with the Republican Party all during 1980 and he qualified as an independent in all states, and no one even challenged him on that basis.  Lawsuits that did challenge Kanye West’s independent petitions in 2020 in Arizona and Idaho on the grounds that he was a registered Republican in Wyoming were both rejected.

At the hearing, the judge asked both sides if the case should be considered moot.  There is no decision yet.  Ironically, Nevada is one of the swing states, and on August 23 Kennedy said he wants to withdraw his name from the ballot in swing states.  Yet he can’t withdraw in Nevada because the deadline to withdraw was August 20.  So he will appear on the Nevada ballot unless the court rules that he isn’t eligible to be an independent candidate.