Tennessee Legislature Passes Bill that makes Only Slight Improvements to Ballot Access

On May 9, the Tennessee Senate passed HB 794 by a vote of 24-9. This is the bill that makes only slight improvements in ballot access for new and minor parties. The bill deletes the requirement that the petition say that the signers are members. It moves the petition deadline from March to early April. But it leaves the same number of signatures that the old law required, 2.5% of the last gubernatorial vote, which would be 40,042 signatures in 2012.

Last year, a U.S. District Court in Tennessee invalidated the old law. The decision says, concerning deadlines, “The 6th Circuit cited and relied upon decisions in other Circuits and district courts holding State deadlines of 60 days and 90 days prior to a primary as creating burdens for minor political parties and voters. 462 F.3d at 586 (citing Council of Alternative Parties v Hooks), 121 F.3d 876,880 (3d Cir. 1997)(60 days deadline before primary an undue burden because ‘the election is remote and voters were generally uninterested in the campaign.’))…Other district courts in this Circuit have stricken state deadlines for lesser periods of time than Tennessee’s 120 days deadline. See Libertarian Party of Kentucky v Ehrler, 776 F.Supp. 1200, 1205-06 (E.D. Ky. 1991)(holding deadline of 119 prior to the primary an unconstitutional burden on voters and minor political parties); Cripps v Seneca Co. Bd. of Elections, 629 F.Supp. 1335, 1338 (N.D. Ohio 1985)(deadline of 75 days before the primary for independent candidates violates the First Amendment).”

The Tennessee bill still leaves a deadline of 120 days between the petition deadline and the August primary, so the bill, if signed into law, will still be unconstitutional.

Vermont Legislature Adjourns, Having Passed Almost No Election Law Bills

The Vermont legislature adjourned for the year on May 6. The only election law of significance that passed this year’s session was the National Popular Vote Plan bill, which was signed into law several weeks ago.

HB 241, which would have changed fusion, never made any headway. Vermont lets two parties jointly nominate the same person now. But that candidate’s name is only listed once on the ballot, with both party names next to the name of that candidate. The bill would have provided two separate boxes on the ballot, so that a voter could indicate a preference for one party.

HB 25, which would have made it more difficult for a party to nominate someone by write-in votes at its own primary, also made no headway.

No bill was ever introduced to move the independent candidate petition deadline from June to a later date, even though a Superior Court has already issued an order which strongly suggests that the deadline is unconstitutionally early.

Texas Bill Advances, Moves Primary from March to April, Improves Petition Deadlines for New Parties

On May 6, the Texas House Defense and Veterans Affairs Committee passed SB 100, after amending it. The amended bill moves the Texas primary (for President and all other office) from March to April. It moves the runoff primary from April to June. This has the indirect effect of moving the petition deadline for new parties from May to June, and the indirect effect of moving the petition deadline for independent candidates (for office other than President) from May to July. The legislature’s web page hasn’t posted the text of the amendments, so it isn’t clear what happens to the petition deadline for independent presidential candidates. See this story.

Colorado Bill Moving Primary Passes; Amendments Make Petition Deadlines Far Worse for New Parties and Independent Candidates

On May 3, the Colorado House passed SB 189, and on May 5, the Senate concurred in the House amendments, so the bill is now through the legislature. The bill moves the non-presidential primary from the 2nd Tuesday in August, to the last Tuesday in June. Unfortunately, the bill was amended to make all petition deadlines for new parties and independent candidates earlier than they had been.

The new deadline for an independent presidential candidate (or the presidential nominee of an unqualified party) moves from 140 days before the general election, to 155 days before the general election. Assuming the bill is signed, the 2012 deadline will be June 4. Colorado already had the nation’s second-earliest deadline for independent presidential candidates (only Texas is earlier) and the new deadline would probably be unconstitutional if challenged in court. Other states in which later independent candidate deadlines have been held unconstitutional are Alaska, Arizona, Kansas, Nevada, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and South Dakota. Ironically, the current Secretary of State of Colorado, Scott Gessler, was in private practice as an attorney before he was elected Secretary of State, and in 2004 he won a lawsuit on behalf of Socialist Party presidential candidate Walt Brown over the former Secretary of State’s refusal to accept Brown’s paperwork on July 4. Brown had slid the paperwork under the Secretary of State’s locked door on that date, which was the deadline, but the former Secretary of State had refused to accept it. Gessler won a state court order that Brown should be put on the ballot.

The bill also moves the petition deadline for a new party to the second Friday in January. Generally, newly-qualifying parties do not nominate by convention, although if two candidates for the same office received a significant vote at the newly-qualifying party’s convention, state law does provide for a primary for that party for just that one office. Such primaries are extremely rare in Colorado. The bill also moves the petition deadline for non-presidential independents to 155 days before the general election, and says that the nominating conventions of ballot-qualified minor parties must be no later than 73 days before the primary.