New Hampshire House Election Law Committee Rejects Presidential Candidate Birth Certificate Requirement

On March 9, the New Hampshire House Election Law Committee decided not to amend any pending election law bill to add a provision about birth certificates for presidential candidates. See the very end of this Washington Post story.

The Committee also voted against HB 176, a bill to prevent college students and military personnel from registering to vote in New Hampshire, if they had been domiciled in another state before entering college or the military. The bill had been introduced by Representative Gregory Sorg (R-Easton). Most of the article is about HB 176.

South Carolina Newspaper Describes Court Hearing on Republican Party Lawsuit on Primaries

The Myrtle Beach, South Carolina newspaper The Sun News has this story about the March 10 hearing in Greenville County Republican Party v State of South Carolina. This is the case in which the Republican Party argues that the U.S. Constitution gives it the ability to decide for itself who can vote in its primaries. The party also argues against the state law that says the party convention can’t choose to nominate by convention unless 75% of the delegates agree.

Alan Keyes Faction of American Independent Party Tentatively Wins Intra-Party Dispute on Procedural Issues

On March 10, a California Superior Court Judge in Solano County tentatively dismissed the lawsuit King v Robinson on procedural issues. Here is the two-paragraph ruling. This case, or similar cases, have been pending since 2008. They concern the identity of the legitimate state officers of the American Independent Party of California. Neither the Superior Court of Sacramento County, nor the Superior Court of Solano County, has ever made a ruling on the merits of the case. The lawsuits have all been filed by the faction of the American Independent Party that is associated with the Constitution Party, after the Secretary of State recognized the faction that is associated with Alan Keyes.

Procedural Victory in Post Office Sidewalks Petitioning Case

On March 10, the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C., denied the request of the U.S. Postal Service for summary judgment in Initiative & Referendum Institute v U.S. Postal Service, 10-5337. This does not mean the case has been won. But it does mean that a 3-judge panel will consider the evidence in the case, in the near future. The court today merely issued a one-sentence order, denying the government’s request for summary judgment.

The three judges who signed the order are Karen Henderson (a Bush Sr. appointee), Merrick Garland (a Clinton appointee), and Brett Kavanaugh (a Bush Jr. appointee). Judges Henderson and Garland already participated in this case earlier, when the U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that postal sidewalks parallel to the street must permit petitioning. At that time, they sent the part of the case about interior sidewalks back to the U.S. District Court Judge. The third judge on the recent panel, Judge Kavanaugh, is new to this case. However, he was part of the 2010 panel that struck down another regulation that outlawed passing out leaflets in all parts of all national parks. That case was Boardley v U.S. Dept. of the Interior.

Utah Legislature Passes Bill to Outlaw Electronic Signatures on All Petitions

On March 8, the Utah Senate passed SB 165 with only one “no” vote. It outlaws electronic signatures on petitions for initiatives, new parties, or candidates. Last year the Utah Supreme Court had construed Utah laws to allow electronic signatures on petitions for candidates, in a case called Anderson v Bell, 234 P.3d 1147. UPDATE: on March 9, the House passed the bill also.

The bill also slightly increases the number of signatures needed for initiatives, from 10% of the last regularly-scheduled gubernatorial vote, to 10% of the last presidential vote. This is a slight change, because Utah gubernatorial regularly-scheduled elections are in presidential years. One wonders why the change was made. It only increases the number of signatures for statewide initiatives by 685 signatures. Utah did have a special gubernatorial election in 2010, because the previous governor had resigned, but the law already excluded using special gubernatorial elections for the calculation of how many signatures are needed. Thanks to Paul Jacob for this news.