Two Pennsylvania Democratic Congressmen, Jason Altmire and Mark Critz, are running against each other in the April 24th primary because Pennsylvania’s new districts put both of them in the same district, the 12th district in the western end of the state. On February 21, supporters of Congressman Critz filed objections to the primary petition of Congressman Altmire. The petition challenge will be heard in Commonwealth Court in Pittsburgh on March 2, at 9:30 a.m. The law requires primary candidates for U.S. House to submit 1,000 valid signatures. Altimire submitted 1,651 signatures.
The objectors say that 385 signatures were collected by a circulator who doesn’t live in the 12th district. The objectors say that certain other signatures on the petition are forgeries. And, of course, the objectors say that some of the signers aren’t registered voters, which is invariably true for all petitions that require a substantial number of signatures. The case is In re Nomination Petition of James Altmire, 114 M.D. 2012.
Pennsylvania and California are the only states that still enforce in-district residency requirements on petitioners. The Pennsylvania in-district residency requirement for circulators was held unconstitutional in 2002 by a U.S. District Court (Morrill v Weaver), but the state courts say that decision doesn’t matter because it only relates to independent candidate petitions, not primary election petitions. Residency requirements for petitioners have been held unconstitutional in Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Kansas, Michigan, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. Thanks to Bill Van Allen for this news.