Missouri Bill Introduced to Eliminate Need for Minor Party Petitions to Carry a Slate of Presidential Elector Candidates

On January 10, four Missouri state representatives introduced HB 1236, which deletes the accidental error in the 1993 ballot access reform bill that requires party petitions to include the names of presidential elector candidates. In general, the Missouri petition to qualify a new party for the ballot does not carry the names of any nominees. The party submits the names of its nominees, for public office generally, after the petition has been circulated.

But due to a drafting error in the law, made in 1993, the law still says the party petition has to list candidates for presidential elector. The bill would fix the error. The bill is sponsored by Republican representatives Sue Entlicher, Tony Dugger, John Diehl, and Democratic representative Jill Schupp.

U.S. District Court Judge Chooses June 26 for New York’s Congressional Primary

On January 27, a U.S. District Court Judge in Albany, New York, issued an opinion, setting the date of New York’s 2012 primary for congressional office on the fourth Tuesday of June, which will be June 26 in 2012. The state is free to decide whether to move its primary for state and local office to that date, or to leave it in September. The case is U.S.A. v State of New York, 1:10-cv-1214.

The basis for the decision is that a June date better protects the interest of overseas absentee ballots. The deadline for candidates running in a congressional primary to submit petitions will be April 26. The state hasn’t even drawn the U.S. House district boundaries. It is now somewhat plausible that the legislature will ease the petitioning burden for primary candidates, at least for 2012. Thanks to Tony Roza for this news.

Decision on Georgia Presidential Qualifications Expected by February 3

On January 27, the Administrative Law Judge who is hearing the challenge to President Obama’s spot on the Georgia Democratic presidential primary asked that post-trial briefs be submitted by Wednesday, February 1. Previously the deadline for such briefs had been February 5. It is expected that the Administrative Law Judge will then rule by February 3. Thanks to Bill Van Allen for this news.

U.S. District Court Suspends Some Texas Election Deadlines

On January 27, a 3-judge U.S. District Court in San Antonio that is hearing the redistricting lawsuit held a status conference that lasted seven hours. At the conclusion, the judges said that if the plaintiffs and the defendants can agree on new district boundaries for U.S. House and legislature by February 6, then the April 3 primary can proceed. Otherwise, it will be postponed.

In the meantime, the deadline for candidates to file for the primary will be re-opened, but when it will be re-opened is not determined. Previously there had been an agreement that it would re-open February 1, but that date is now defunct and the new date will be settled later.

U.S. District Court Judge in Missouri Rules Against Local Initiative Proponents over Number of Signatures Requires

On January 27, a U.S. District Court Judge in Missouri ruled against proponents of a local initiative in Poplar Bluff, Missouri. The case is Rexroat v City of Poplar Bluff, eastern district, 1:11cv-224. Missouri law says local initiatives in some kinds of cities need signatures equal to 25% of the last vote cast for Mayor, and that local initiatives in certain other types of cities need 25% of the number of registered voters. The proponents have enough valid signatures under the first standard, but not under the second standard. The judge ruled that Poplar Bluff is the type of city with the more onerous requirement, so the initiative is off the ballot. The subject of the initiative was regulation of cable systems.