Oral Argument in the “Other” Virginia Petitioner Residency Lawsuit Postponed Until Next Week

The U.S. District Court in Richmond, Virginia, had been expecting to hear Lux v Judd on January 17, but the hearing has been postponed until January 25, at 2 p.m. Lux v Judd, filed in 2010, concerns the Virginia law that petitioners can’t work outside their home U.S. House district, if they are working on a petition for a U.S. House candidate. Lux, an independent candidate, was kept off the ballot in 2010 because of the circulator residency requirement, but his lawsuit is still alive.

Probably the hearing was postponed so that everyone can see what happens in the presidential petitioner residency lawsuit, filed by Rick Perry, now pending in the 4th circuit.

Another Illinois Legislator Knocked off Republican Primary Ballot by Petition Challenge

Illinois State Senator John O. Jones, who has been in the Illinois Senate since the 2002 election, will not appear on the March 2012 Republican primary ballot because his petition was challenged and Jones decided he can’t defend his own petition. He says he may form his own political party and petition onto the November ballot. He is also free to be an independent candidate if he wishes. See this story.

Jones is the second incumbent Republican state legislator this year to be forced off a primary ballot. The first was Representative Rosemary Mulligan, who intends to win re-nomination in her primary via write-in votes. Unlike Jones, Mulligan has no primary opponent, so it is obvviously much easier for her to win a write-in nomination in the primary than it would be for Jones. Thanks to Bill Van Allen for the link.

Virginia Bills to Allow Write-In Votes in Primaries

On January 11, Virginia State Senator Frank W. Wagner (R-Virginia Beach) introduced SB 510, to allow write-in votes in all primaries. Currently Virginia permits write-ins in all general elections, but not in any primaries. See this story, which says that although the bill may pass, legislative leaders don’t expect to pass it with an urgency clause. That would require an 80% vote in each house of the legislature. Thanks to Rick Hasen for the link. UPDATE: the same bill is pending in the House. It is HB 1132, by Delegate Mark Cole (R-Fredericksburg).

North Carolina Ballot Access Case Docketed in U.S. Supreme Court

The North Carolina ballot access case is now docketed in the U.S. Supreme Court. It is Greene v Bartlett, 11-868. It challenges the ballot access law for independent candidates for the U.S. House. The law is so severe, no independent candidate for U.S. House has ever appeared on a government-printed ballot for that office in North Carolina. North Carolina has been using government-printed ballots since 1901.

In 2010, the Service Employees International Union decided to support an independent candidate for U.S. House in one district in North Carolina, and it submitted a petition, which was checked and found to be valid. However, the candidate named in that petition refused to run. But because the petition appears to have succeeded, the U.S. District Court, and the 4th circuit, said that the procedure is not impossible, and upheld it. No evidence was ever gathered about the SEIU petition drive, but it probably cost the SEIU between $50,000 and $100,000 for paid petitioners. The law requires the signatures of 4% of the registered voters in the district, which is approximately 20,000 valid signatures. The law also requires a large filing fee in addition.

New Mexico Republican Party Wins Partial Injunctive Relief in Campaign Finance Lawsuit

On January 5, the New Mexico Republican Party won part of its lawsuit against certain New Mexico campaign finance laws that limit contributions to political parties. Judge William Johnson, a Bush Jr. appointee, enjoined the state from enforcing a $5,000 limit to political parties, if the money will be spent on independent expenditures. But he refused to enjoin the state from enforcing the $5,000 limit if the money will be used by the party to directly help its nominees.

Also, the judge ruled that the New Mexico limits on political parties cannot be applied to federal campaigns. The state had conceded that point. The case is Republican Party of New Mexico v King, 1:11-cv-900. Here is the 15-page order. Thanks to Rick Hasen for the link.