New York Lawsuit on Who Can Petition for Primary Candidates Reaches U.S. Supreme Court

On January 10, a group of voters and candidates filed a cert petition with the U.S. Supreme Court, in the lawsuit over who may circulate nominating petitions to get candidates on New York primary ballots. New York says no one can circulate a petition to get a candidate on a primary ballot unless the circulator is either registered in that party, or a notary public or a commissioner of deeds. The case is Maslow v Board of Elections, 11-857.

The state has already asked for a month’s extension for its response, and the Court has granted the extension. The state’s response is now due March 9.

Nebraska Bill, Making it Easier for Parties to Remain on Ballot, Has Committee Hearing February 1

On February 1, the Nebraska Senate Government, Military & Veterans Affairs Committee will hear LB 757, the bill to make it easier for a party to remain ballot-qualified. The bill says if a party meets the 5% vote test, it then remains on the ballot for the next two elections, instead of just the next election.

Freedom Socialist Party Nominates its First National Ticket

On January 26, the Freedom Socialist Party announced that it has nominated its first national ticket. The presidential nominee is Stephen Durham of New York, and the vice-presidential nominee is Christina Lopez of Washington state. See here for more about the ticket.

The Freedom Socialist Party has run nominees for various public offices starting in 1991. It has had candidates for Congress, state legislature, or city office, in California, New York, Oregon, and Washington. Thanks to IndependentPoliticalReport for the link.

Rick Perry Withdraws from Virginia Lawsuit Over Out-of-State Petitioners, but Gingrich will Keep the Lawsuit Alive

On January 27, Texas Governor Rick Perry asked to withdraw from the lawsuit Perry v Judd, 12-1067, the case in the 4th circuit over Virginia’s ban on out-of-state circulators. However, Newt Gingrich, who had intervened in the lawsuit last month, will keep the case alive.

The U.S. District Court in this case had ruled that the out-of-state circulator ban is almost certainly unconstitutional, but that Perry and the other intervening presidential candidates had filed the lawsuit too late to get injunctive relief. Perry had appealed the denial of injunctive relief, but the 4th circuit had agreed that he had filed the case too late. The 4th circuit has not yet expressed an opinion about the constitutionality of the state ban on out-of-state circulators, but will probably do so fairly soon. Briefs on that issue are all due by March 30, 2012. In the meantime, it seems likely that the legislature will repeal the ban on petitioners who live in Virginia but who circulate outside their home district, but will retain the ban on out-of-state circulators.

Nebraska Petition Drive Launched to Reduce Number of Signatures Needed for Statewide Initiatives

Kent Bernbeck, a Nebraska resident who has been active for 20 years to protect the initiative process in that state, has launched an initiative petition that would amend the state constitution, so as to return the number of signatures required for statewide initiatives and referenda to the standard that was in effect before 1994.

Before 1994, Nebraska initiatives required signatures equal in number to 10% of the last gubernatorial vote, to amend the State Constitution; and 7% of the last gubernatorial vote, to amend a statute. A statewide referendum petition needed 5% of the last gubernatorial vote. But, in 1994, the State Supreme Court ruled in Duggan v Beermann, 515 NW 2d 788, that the actual base of the percentages should be the number of registered voters, not the last gubernatorial vote. Back when the initiative and referendum has first existed in Nebraska in 1912, most counties didn’t require voter registration so it was impossible to base the requirement on the number of registered voters. By 1988, when voter registration was established throughout the state, one of the Constitution’s references to the number of signatures was changed inadvertently to the number of registered voters, but another section of the State Constitution was not changed, so the situation was ambiguous, and the State Supreme Court resolved it unfavorably to initiative proponents.

Bernback had an op-ed in the January 27 Omaha World-Herald about his new petition to restore the base for the percentage as the gubernatorial vote. One of the worst aspects of the existing law is that proponents of an initiative or referendum can’t even know how many signatures they need, while they are working on their petition, because the number depends on how many registered voters there are when they submit the petition.