Last year, U.S. District Court Judge Algenon Marbley issued an injunction, putting the Ohio Libertarian Party on the ballot. The Ohio Secretary of State did not appeal, but the Ohio legislature then moved to intervene. On December 21, 2011, the Ohio legislature filed a brief in the 6th circuit, arguing that the U.S. District Court should not have put the Libertarian Party on the ballot. The brief also argues that the legislature has standing to intervene, and that its appeal is timely.
The legislature argues that when it passed a new ballot access law in the summer of 2011, that new law was constitutional, and the Libertarian Party should have then commenced to get the required 38,525 signatures, even though at the time no one knew if that law were going to be in effect or not. The uncertainty was caused by the fact that a referendum petition was filed against the new law, preventing it from going into effect. Furthermore, neither the Libertarian Party nor anyone else could possibly have known what the petition deadline would be. The new law said the petition deadline would be 90 days before the primary, but the legislature moved the date of the primary twice during the latter half of 2011. The legislature’s argument is almost laughable. The Ohio Libertarian Party will be filing its response soon. In the meantime, the state is going ahead with preparations for the Libertarian Party primary, and the primary for the other minor parties that were added to the ballot by the Secretary of State because it didn’t make sense for him to put the Libertarian Party on, and not the other minor parties.