Illinois Elections Officials Ask Absentee Voters Not to Vote Yet, Because Ballots May Change

According to this story, Illinois elections officials have made absentee ballots available, but are asking voters not to use them, because the final ballot may have a different set of candidates.  First, as the story mentions, the Constitution Party statewide slate may be added to the ballot if the party wins in court.  The hearing is Friday, September 24.

Also, in one State Senate race, the Illinois Supreme Court will soon decide whether the Republican nominee, Steve Rauschenberger, should be removed from the ballot.  See this story.  The hearing is Wednesday, September 22.  Democrats want to remove Rauschenberger from the ballot because he voted in a Democratic primary for local office in 2009.  The story’s use of the term “open primary” doesn’t mean a “top-two” system.  It is the Illinois term for the type of open primary in which the voter need not choose a primary ballot in public, but rather decides in the secrecy of the voting booth which party primary to choose.  Illinois already has an open primary.

Ralph Nader Submits Evidence in Case Against Democratic National Committee Behavior in 2004

On September 20, Ralph Nader’s attorney submitted 275 pages of affidavits, from 14 individuals, explaining what the Democratic National Committee and some of its allies did to Nader’s 2004 presidential campaign.  The evidence includes affidavits from some of his circulators, who were subject to pressure to stop them from working.  The evidence is for the case now pending state court in Maine.  The volume of this evidence is sufficiently lengthy that the judge is postponing the hearing until November 5, to give the other side a chance to digest that evidence.  The evidence focuses on what happened in 2004 in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Oregon, Maine, New Hampshire, and West Virginia.

Oregon, California Hold 3-Party Debates in U.S. House Races

On September 20, the League of Women Voters sponsored a debate for all candidates listed on the ballot in the California’s U.S. House District 6.  See this story.  The candidates who debated were Lynn Woolsey, the Democratic incumbent; Michael Halliwell, the Republican nominee; and Eugene Ruyle, Peace & Freedom nominee.

Also on September 20, a debate was held for the candidates on the ballot in Oregon’s U.S. House district 4.  See this story.  The candidates who debated were Democratic incumbent Peter DeFazio, Republican nominee Art Robinson, and Mike Beilstein of the Green Party.

Randy Credico Expects to Sue Over New York Fusion Restriction

New York state law lets two qualified parties jointly nominate the same person.  The law also allows a qualified party and an unqualified party to jointly nominate the same person.  If that happens, the candidate’s name is listed on the ballot twice.  But if someone is nominated by two unqualified parties, his or her name is only listed once.

Randy Credico has been nominated for U.S. Senate, full term, by both the Libertarian Party, and the Anti-Prohibition Party.  But the State Board of Elections has told him his name can be listed only once on the ballot, and that he must choose one line.  He expects to file a lawsuit to be appear twice.  In 1971, a 3-judge U.S. District Court said that a former law, forbidding an unqualified party and a qualified party from jointly nominating the same person, for most offices, was unconstitutional.  That case was United Ossining Party v Hayduk.  The logic of that decision should help Credico.

Especially telling is that many prominent New York major party nominees have been nominated by three qualified parties, so their names appear three times on the ballot.  For instance, Andrew Cuomo is listed three times as a gubernatorial nominee:  as a Democrat, a Working Families nominee, and an Independence Party nominee.

Florida Court Won’t Freeze Campaign Spending by Governor Charlie Crist

On September 21, a Florida state court denied a request by two Republican donors to Governor Charlie Crist that the Governor be enjoined from spending money in his campaign account.  He is an independent candidate for U.S. Senate.  The plaintiffs are Republicans who had donated to Crist’s campaign back when he was a Republican, and they want their donations returned.  The case is still going on.  See this news story.