U.S. Supreme Court Asks for Response in Roland Burris Lawsuit on Special U.S. Senate Election

On September 14, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer asked for a response from the Appellees in Burris v Judge, 10A272.  This is the case in which U.S. Senator Roland Burris of Illinois argues that the lower federal courts overstepped their authority when they told Illinois whom to print on the November 2, 2010 ballot in the special U.S. Senate election.

The U.S. District Court Judge in this case had ordered that everyone who is on the ballot for the 6-year regular term should also be on the ballot for the special 2-month term, and no one else could run in the special election.

If the U.S. Supreme Court acts on the side of Senator Burris, one possible relief would be to simply cancel the special election.  Another possibility would be for Illinois to hold a special election with no names on the ballot, and depend on write-ins to elect someone to the 2-month term.  This is how California handled a similar election in November 1946.  A third possibility would be that state party committees be authorized to choose a party nominee in the special election, although that solution would still leave the problem of how independent candidates could qualify for the special election.  In 1986, when Michigan had no statutory procedure for independent candidates to get on the ballot, the Secretary of State simply placed any independent candidate on the ballot who requested to be on, which worked well.

Columnist Darrell Delamaide Says Results of Republican Primaries Leave Opening for a Third Force in U.S. Politics

Columnist Darrell Delamaide’s September 15 column says that the results of recent Republican primaries for important office is creating a political vacuum for centrist voters, and again brings up the idea that Mayor Michael Bloomberg could find success in 2012 as an independent presidential candidate.

No Appeal Will be Filed in Tancredo Ballot Access Case

The two Colorado voters who had sued the Secretary of State, arguing that Tom Tancredo should not be on the ballot, have decided not to appeal, so it is certain that Tancredo will be on the ballot.  Thanks to John Duffy for this news.

The state district court ruling will be a useful precedent for ballot-qualified minor parties in Colorado in the future, giving them flexibility to replace their original nominees with replacement nominees who had not been previously registered members of that party.

First Circuit Hears Massachusetts Libertarian Presidential Substitution Lawsuit

On September 15, the U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit, held oral arguments in Barr v Galvin, the Massachusetts case over whether unqualified parties may use stand-in presidential candidates on their petition, and then substitute the actual presidential candidate later.  The three judges were Michael Boudin, Bruce Selya, and Kenneth Ripple.  Judge Ripple is a visiting judge from Indiana.

In 2008, the Massachusetts Libertarian Party was not a ballot-qualified party, so it needed to submit a petition to be on the November 2008 ballot for president.  The party had asked the Massachusetts Secretary of State if it could use a stand-in presidential candidate on its petition, because the party wouldn’t know who its actual presidential candidate was going to be until the national convention at the end of May 2008.  Massachusetts said “Yes”.  Later, the state changed its mind and refused to list Bob Barr on the ballot.  The party sued and won in U.S. District Court in time for relief.  The state then filed its appeal.

All three judges participated in the oral argument and all three seemed very familiar with the facts in the case.  They questioned both sides about whether the case is moot, but both sides agreed that the issue is not moot because it will recur in future presidential elections.  The panel gave the impression that they believe the Massachusetts policy on whether or not presidential stand-ins are permitted is too vague to survive.

New York Conservative Party Primary Results

According to this story, Rick Lazio received 11,084 votes in the New York Conservative Party gubernatorial primary, defeating Ralph Lorigo, who had 7,254.  That was with 89% of the precincts counted.

Lorigo is an ally of Carl Paladino, who defeated Lazio in the Republican gubernatorial primary.  The new few days will determine whether Lazio will continue to be the Conservative Party nominee, or whether he will withdraw.  This story says that for now, Lazio will continue to run as the Conservative Party nominee.