U.S. District Court Strikes Down Nebraska Ban on Out-of-State Petitioners

On August 30, U.S. District Court Judge Joseph Bataillon issued opinions in two closely related cases, Bernbeck v Gale, 4:10cv-3001, and Citizens in Charge v Gale, 4:09cv-3255. In the Citizens in Charge case, the judge struck down the Nebraska law that bans out-of-state circulators, but upheld a state law that says all petitions must carry in red ink and large font, “This petition is circulated by a paid circulator.” Of course, if the circulator is not being paid, the petition need not carry that message. UPDATE: here is the AP story on the decision.

In the Bernbeck case, the Judge upheld the state’s ban on paying circulators on a per-signature basis. However, the state law does not ban paying bonuses to circulators who have high productivity. Also in the Bernbeck case, the Judge struck down a law saying the sponsor of a local initiative must be a resident of that locality. He upheld a law making it illegal for people under age 18 to circulate petitions. Here is the Bernbeck decision. Here is the Citizens in Charge decision, the one that strikes down the ban on out-of-state circulators.

The decision striking down the ban on out-of-state circulators is very significant, because in 2001 the 8th circuit had upheld North Dakota’s ban on out-of-state circulators, and Nebraska is in the 8th circuit. Judge Battaillon said the 8th circuit case is not controlling because in that case, the plaintiffs did not present any evidence about how burdensome the ban is. In the recent Nebraska case, the plaintiffs did present such evidence. Thanks to Kent Bernbeck for this news and for one of the links, and thanks to Paul Jacob for the other link.

California Superior Court Dismisses Intra-American Independent Party Lawsuit

On August 23, a California Superior Court Judge in Solano County dismissed the lawsuit King v Robinson, FCS034452. This is the lawsuit over which faction in the California American Independent Party represents the party. The faction that is allied with the national Constitution Party had filed the lawsuit. That faction is now free to appeal, if they wish to do so. The Superior Court had not actually adjudicated the case, but had instead said that it is moot. Thanks to Markham Robinson for this news.

Pennsylvania State Senator Charged with Tampering with Evidence

Pennsylvania State Senator Jane Orie has been charged with tampering with evidence, and faces sixteen felony charges. She also still faces a retrial in charges filed last year, in which the prosecutor believes state employees worked on her re-election campaign on state time. See this story. Orie has been a Pennsylvania state legislator since she was first elected in 1996. She is a Republican from Allegheny County and an attorney. One of her sisters is a Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice.

U.S. District Court Judge Indicates a Ruling Likely by September 2 in Ohio Libertarian Ballot Access Case

On August 30, a U.S. District Court Judge listened to testimony in Libertarian Party of Ohio v Husted. Michael Johnston of the Ohio Libertarian Party, testified for the plaintiffs, and a representative of the Secretary of State provided testimony on the other side. The judge indicated he expects to issue a ruling by Friday, September 2. The issue is whether the new Ohio ballot access law is constitutional, and also whether due process prevents the Secretary of State from eliminating the four ballot-qualified minor parties on such short notice. The 2011 session of the legislature had passed a new law to replace the law held unconstitutional in 2006, but the new law still requires as many signatures as the old law, and sets an early February petition deadline for petitions to qualify a party.