Maine Struggles to get Precise Election Data Needed to Determine Political Party Ongoing Status

In 2009, the Maine legislature eased the vote test for a party to remain ballot-qualified. The old test required a party to poll 5% of the vote for the office at the top of the ticket, at either of the last two elections. This was a difficult test, but the Green Party satisfied it by polling over 5% for Governor in all gubernatorial elections 1994 through 2006.

In 2009, the legislature changed the test for a party to remain ballot-qualified. No longer did it need to poll 5% for a top office. Instead, it merely had to have at least 10,000 registered members who voted in the general election. It didn’t matter whom they voted for. The legislature could have made this much simpler by just saying a party remained ballot-qualified if it had at least 10,000 registered members, but that is not what they did.

As a result, Maine election officials are required to do an elaborate calculation of how many registered members in each party voted in a general election. This job is so difficult, Maine still hasn’t finished the 2010 calculation. The Maine Secretary of State knows that at least 16,272 registered Greens did vote in November 2010, so the party is safely on the ballot for 2012. But the calculation is still incomplete, because six towns still haven’t reported the data to the Secretary of State. There is no problem, because the Green Party easily exceeded the requirement, but if the party’s turnout had been significantly worse, it might still not know for sure whether it had met the test. In November 2010 there were 34,255 registered Greens, so it isn’t surprising that at least 10,000 of them voted.

Clerk of U.S. House of Representatives Publishes November 2010 Election Results

Ever since 1920, the Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives has been publishing a book that shows how many votes each candidate for Congress received in the preceding election. The Clerk has just published the latest volume, which is titled “Statistics of the Congressional Election of November 2, 2010.” The book is interesting because it includes tables at the back, showing the vote for each house of Congress by party. These tables will not recognize a minor party candidate for Congress as a candidate of that party, unless the state prints the party’s label on the ballot. For example, Oklahoma and Tennessee have extremely easy ballot access for non-presidential independent candidates, but extremely difficult ballot access for new and minor parties. Therefore, minor party candidates in Oklahoma and Tennessee for over ten years have all been on the ballot as “independent”, so the Clerk’s tables show those votes in the Independent column, not the column of any particular party.

Even with that limitation, the 2010 chart for U.S. House lists the Libertarian Party’s national vote total as 1,002,511. The Clerk’s tables have credited the Libertarian Party with over 1,000,000 votes for U.S. House in five elections now. Besides 2010, they are: 2000 1,610,292; 2002 1,030,189; 2004 1,040,465; and and 2008 1,083,096. The Clerk’s booklet has never credited any other party (besides the Democrats and Republicans) with as many as 1,000,000 votes for U.S. House. The Progressive Party had over 1,000,000 votes for U.S. House in 1912, but the booklet didn’t exist back then. Thanks to Thomas Jones for the news about the book.

Arkansas Judge Rules Initiative Petition Backers May Have 10 Days More to Gather More Signatures

On June 28, an Arkansas state circuit judge in Sebastian County ruled that organizers of a local initiative may have ten more days after their petition was rejected, to get more valid signatures. See this story. Arkansas is the only state in the nation that gives petitioning groups extra time to get more signatures, after they are told that their original petition lacks enough valid signatures.

Prescott Mayor Wins Ballot Access Case

On June 28, a Superior Court in Yavapai County, Arizona, ruled that Prescott Mayor Marlin Kuykendall should remain on the ballot in the August 2011 election. Kuykendall is running for re-election. See this story. His ballot position had been challenged because he did not sign his Statement of Campaign Organization form.