Georgia Republican Gubernatorial Candidate Balks at Party Loyalty Oath

Raymond O. Boyd is one of eight candidates seeking the Republican Party’s gubernatorial nomination. The primary is July 20. Boyd is a newcomer to politics and he has already put $2,000,000 into his campaign account. Under Georgia campaign finance laws, even if he should drop out of the race, he could only recover $250,000 of his own money back.

The Georgia Republican Party requires candidates in its primaries to sign an oath that says, “I do hereby swear or affirm my allegiance to the Republican Party.” Boyd says he won’t sign the oath. The party says he can’t run if he doesn’t sign the oath. See this story. UPDATE: on Monday, April 26, Boyd made a personal appeal to the Republican Party to let him run in its primary without signing the oath, but the party refused. See this story.

It is conceivable that Boyd will choose to run as an independent candidate for Governor. He would need 44,089 valid signatures by July 13. This earlier story about Boyd suggests that running as an independent has crossed his mind. Georgia hasn’t had an independent candidate on the ballot for Governor since 1942. Back in 1942, any independent could get on the general election ballot just by filing a declaration of candidacy and a filing fee. In 1943, Georgia started requiring petitions of 5% of the number of registered voters for independent candidates, and no independent for Governor has ever met that test. Thanks to Kyle Bennett for these links.

Congressional Candidate Still Tussling with South Carolina Democratic Party

Brian Doyle, a candidate for U.S. House in this year’s Democratic primary, is still maintaining his federal lawsuit against the South Carolina Democratic Party. Doyle is an ex-felon. Originally, the party refused to let him file to run in its primary. He then sued the party. The case is called Doyle v South Carolina Democratic Party, 3:10cv-203.

Then the party relented and let him file to be on its primary ballot, but the party continued to refuse to list him on its web page, in the section that lists Democrats running for Congress. Judge Henry Floyd asked the party to respond in writing why it was not listing Doyle. Now the party has listed Doyle, and provided contact information for him, on its web page. But the party still refuses to list Doyle’s picture (it does show a picture of the other congressional candidates) and it still doesn’t mention Doyle’s web page. So the dispute continues.

U.S. Supreme Court Ponders Ex-Felon Voting Case, Doesn’t Decide Either to Hear it or Not

The U.S. Supreme Court held a conference on Friday, April 23. One of the cases considered was Simmons v Galvin, 09-797, the case from Massachusetts on whether the Voting Rights Act applies to the question of whether felons and/or ex-felons may register to vote. The Court did not decide whether to hear this case or not, and will consider that question again at the April 30 conference.

If the Court takes the case, it will be the first time it has taken a case on ex-felon or felon voting rights since 1985.

U.S. Supreme Court Ponders Ex-Felon Voting Case, Doesn't Decide Either to Hear it or Not

The U.S. Supreme Court held a conference on Friday, April 23. One of the cases considered was Simmons v Galvin, 09-797, the case from Massachusetts on whether the Voting Rights Act applies to the question of whether felons and/or ex-felons may register to vote. The Court did not decide whether to hear this case or not, and will consider that question again at the April 30 conference.

If the Court takes the case, it will be the first time it has taken a case on ex-felon or felon voting rights since 1985.