Oral Argument Date Set in District of Columbia Write-in Counting Case

U.S. District Court Judge Beryl Howell has tentatively set a hearing date of 10:30 a.m. on March 4 for oral arguments in Libertarian Party v District of Columbia Board of Elections, 09-cv-1676. This is the case in which the party and Bob Barr argue that the U.S. Constitution requires that all valid votes must be counted, including write-in votes for presidential candidates who file a declaration of write-in candidacy. In 1975 the D.C. Appeals Court had ruled in Kamins v Board of Elections that the board must print write-in space on general election ballots for president, and must count those votes. The D.C. Board of Elections has interpreted that to mean that all it must do is count the total number of write-ins cast for President, without specifying how many write-in votes any particular candidate received, even if he or she had filed a declaration of write-in candidacy.

The case was filed in 2009 in the D.C. Court system, and the Board of Elections had it transferred to federal court. The first U.S. District Court Judge who had the case asked the U.S. Justice Department if it wished to express an opinion, but the Justice Department declined. Recently the case was transferred to Judge Howell, who is new to the federal bench.

Various Republican Party Lawsuits Against Florida Ballot-Qualified Tea Party Candidates are Dismissed

In 2010, a new party called the Tea Party qualified for the Florida ballot. Many of the Tea Party nominees had their ballot positions challenged in lawsuits filed by various Republicans. For a summary of these lawsuits, see this web page of “Central Florida Republicans.” Most of these lawsuits have been dismissed. On February 1, the lawsuit Hensarling v Foley, which had been pending in state Circuit Court in the Orange-Osceola district, was dismissed before the plaintiffs were able to engage in discovery. See this story. The defendant, Jon Foley, had appeared on the November 2, 2010 ballot as the Tea Party nominee for State House, 41st district.

Text of Congressman Heath Shuler’s Bill on Redistricting

Here is the text of HR 453, the bill introduced on January 26 by North Carolina Congressman Heath Shuler to require the states to use bipartisan redistricting commissions to draw boundaries for U.S. House boundaries. The bill has a special procedure for Nebraska, which has a nonpartisan state legislature.

At the close of registration for the November 2010 election, 26.4% of all registered voters were registered outside the two major parties (these figures, of course, only relate to the 29 states that have registration by party, plus D.C.). It is unfortunate that no bill in Congress, to reform procedures for redistricting, has any procedure for those voters to participate in redistricting commissions. California’s new procedure for a redistricting commission includes them.