Nevada Democratic Party Files Response in U.S. Supreme Court in Green Party Ballot Access Case

On September 17, the Nevada Democratic Party filed this response in the U.S. Supreme Court in Nevada Green Party v Aguilar and Nevada Democratic Party, 24A262. The brief mostly says there are procedural rules for why the Nevada Green Party’s request should be denied. The Democratic Party only mentions Trump v Anderson in a single sentence, merely asserting that Trump v Anderson doesn’t change anything.

In Trump v Anderson, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously said that the relationship between the people and the presidency of the United States is so strong, Article Two impplicitly bars a “patchwork” in which presidential candidates are on the ballot in some states and not other states. If the Nevada Green Party cannot get on the ballot this year, Nevada, Oklahoma and South Dakota voters will be the only ones in the nation who are barred from physically casting a vote for Jill Stein.

Georgia Supreme Court Will Decide Whether Claudia De la Cruz and Cornel West Remain on Ballot

On Sunday, September 15, the Georgia Supreme Court took jurisdiction of the ballot access appeal of Claudia De la Cruz and Cornel West. The lower court had removed them, saying they should not have submitted petitions in the name of the presidential candidates, but that instead they should have submitted a petition for each of their presidential elector candidates. See this story.

Wisconsin State Court Keeps Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. On the Ballot Against His Wishes

On September 16, a Dane County Circuit Court ruled that Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., cannot remove his name from the Wisconsin ballot. Kennedy had argued that the law on withdrawals is discriminatory. Nominees of qualified parties can remove their names as late as September 3, but independent candidates cannot withdraw after August 6. The judge did not address the constitutional argument. Kennedy is appealing to the Wisconsin State Appeals Court.