Frederic von Anhalt Declares as an Independent Candidate for California Governor

On January 25, Frederic von Anhalt said he will run as an independent candidate for Governor of California. See this story, which explains his platform. UPDATE: Here is his campaign site. No one has used the California independent candidate procedure to get on the ballot for Governor since 1978, when Ed Clark qualified. Clark was not a true independent; he was the Libertarian Party nominee. But the Libertarian Party was not ballot-qualified in California in 1978, so Clark used the independent procedure.

Before 1978, no independent qualified for California governor since 1918, when Theodore Bell qualified. Bell was not a true independent either. He was the choice of the Democratic Party for Governor, and he used the independent procedure because, due to a quirk in California election laws back then, the Democratic Party had no nominee for Governor in 1918. No true independent candidate for California Governor has ever been on a government-printed ballot in California.

Indiana Supreme Court Will Hear State’s Appeal in Voter Photo-ID Case

On January 25, the Indiana Supreme Court said it will hear the state’s appeal in League of Women Voters v Rokita, the case over whether Indiana’s Constitution is violated by the state’s law, requiring voters at the polls to show government photo-ID in order to vote. The State Court of Appeals had invalidated the law on September 17, 2009, by a vote of 3-0. The State Court of Appeals decision is reported at 915 NE 2d 151. Thanks to Rick Hasen for this news.

Indiana Supreme Court Will Hear State's Appeal in Voter Photo-ID Case

On January 25, the Indiana Supreme Court said it will hear the state’s appeal in League of Women Voters v Rokita, the case over whether Indiana’s Constitution is violated by the state’s law, requiring voters at the polls to show government photo-ID in order to vote. The State Court of Appeals had invalidated the law on September 17, 2009, by a vote of 3-0. The State Court of Appeals decision is reported at 915 NE 2d 151. Thanks to Rick Hasen for this news.

Will the Citizens United Decision Help Propel Public Funding of Candidates?

Both houses of Congress have bills to provide for public funding of candidates for Congress. They are S752 and HR 1826. The Senate bill has 5 co-sponsors and the House bill has 126 co-sponsors.

Many Democrats in Congress have expressed dismay at the U.S. Supreme Court’s campaign finance opinion, Citizens United v Federal Election Commission, handed down January 21. That decision lets corporations and unions run their own advertising, either supporting or criticizing candidates for federal office. Much commentary has predicted that the ruling will cause renewed interest in public funding of campaigns. However, so far, no new co-sponsors have signed up to either of the public funding bills since the decision came down. It is possible that in the next few weeks and months, though, there will be new support for the bills.

California Legislator Declares Himself Opposed to “Top-Two Open Primary”

California Assemblymember Manuel Perez, a Democrat who represents Imperial County and eastern Riverside County, says in this newspaper interview that he opposes the “top-two open primary” that will be on the June 2010 ballot. He mentioned the lack of voter choices in November, if the proposal passes.

The interview appears in The Desert Sun, a Palm Springs daily newspaper that has carried commentary in favor of “top-two”, but which has so far declined to print a letter to the editor from a resident of the Palm Springs area who sent such a letter.