Alaska Court Lets Lisa Murkowski Intervene in Joe Miller’s Lawsuit Over Vote Count

On December 2, a state court in Juneau, Alaska ruled that U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski is permitted to intervene in the lawsuit Miller v Lieutenant Governor, over the vote count for the U.S. Senate race.  She will argue that write-ins should count even when the voter forgets, or doesn’t know, to fill in the oval next to the name just written in.  She almost certainly doesn’t need such votes, but she will be the only one taking that stance.  Miller and the state agree that those kind of write-ins shouldn’t count.

Vladimir Putin Criticizes U.S. for Presidential Elections in Which 2nd Place Finisher in Popular Vote Took the Office

Vladimir Putin has recently criticized the United States for its electoral college system, and specifically around the way it worked in 2000, when Al Gore received 560,000 more popular votes than George W. Bush, and yet Bush became President.  See this story.  Thanks to Jeff Patch for the link.

New York City Final Official Vote Count is 17% Higher than Election Night Tally

New York state is still tallying the official results for the November 2, 2010.  However, the New York city Board of Elections has just finished its tally.  According to this story, its final official count of the number of votes cast is 17% higher than the total reported a few days after the election.

This news is good news for the Libertarian Party.  The odds that the party polled at least 50,000 votes for Governor are now considerably better.  Thanks to Rick Hasen’s ElectionLawBlog for this news.

California Libertarians Submit New Evidence in Lawsuit Against Residency Requirement for Petition Circulators

On November 22, the Los Angeles County Libertarian Party filed an amended complaint, and new exhibits, in Libertarian Party of Los Angeles County v Bowen, U.S. District Court, central district, cv10-2488.  This is the case that challenges California laws that make it illegal for anyone to circulate a ballot access petition for a candidate if that circulator doesn’t live in the candidate’s district.

U.S. District Court Judge Philip Gutierrez already issued a tentative ruling in this case, on November 2.  He said plaintiffs lack standing because the Secretary of State alleges she won’t enforce these laws.  The judge has invited the plaintiffs to submit a new complaint, which would contain factual allegations that the law is enforced, and that new complaint has now been filed.

The new complaint points out that the Secretary of State’s web page for one of the 2011 special legislative elections says in three places that petitions to place candidates on the ballot in that special election may only be circulated by residents of that district.  Furthermore, the complaint points out that another portion of the Secretary of State’s web page, which describes the qualifications to run for state office, says that the California Constitution requires one-year residence in the district for candidates but also says that the Secretary of State will not enforce that residency requirement for candidates.  Thus, the Secretary of State’s general policy seems to be to explain which laws she will and won’t enforce, so the obvious question is why her web page doesn’t say she won’t enforce the residency requirements for circulators as well.

It will be interesting to see if the Secretary of State revises her web page in response to this new complaint.

Hearing Set in New York Case Over How to Tally Votes for Two Parties Who are Running the Same Nominee

U.S. District Court Judge Jed Rakoff will hold a hearing in Conservative Party of New York and Working Families Party of New York v New York State Board of Elections on Monday, December 6, at 4 p.m.  This is the case that contests the state’s policy on counting votes.  When two parties jointly nominate the same candidate, and a voter casts two votes for that one candidate (one vote on each party’s line), the state deems that to be one vote for the party closest to the top of the ballot.  This means, generally, that a voter who votes twice for a candidate who has been nominated by the Conservative Party and the Republican Party, the Republican Party gets that vote and the Conservative Party doesn’t.

The state will try to persuade the judge to dismiss the case.  If the state fails to do that, there will be a trial in June 2011.

This problem mostly didn’t exist before 2010 in New York state, because before 2010, voters at the polls generally used mechanical voting machines, with levers.  The machine physically prevented anyone from voting for two candidates for the same office.  But starting in 2010, New York state uses paper ballots.