U.S. District Court in Minnesota Declines Injunctive Relief over Buttons at Polling Place

On November 1, a hearing was held in Minnesota Majority v Mansky, cv 10-4401, U.S. District Court in Minnesota.  At the conclusion of the hearing, the judge refused injunctive relief to plaintiffs who want to wear buttons on their clothing at the polls on November 2.  See this 6-page order.  Thanks to Rick Hasen’s ElectionLawBlog for the link.

U.S. District Court Cancels Hearing in California Libertarian Case Over Circulator Residency, Will Decide on the Briefs

The Libertarian Party of Los Angeles County filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court on April 2, 2010, against a law that prohibit circulators for in-lieu of filing fee petitions from working outside their home county and also prohibits them from working outside their home district.  A hearing was to have been held on that case on November 1.  However, on October 29, the judge canceled the hearing and will decide the case on the briefs.  The state has filed a motion, asking that the case be dismissed on the grounds that the law does not injure any of the plaintiffs.

California does not enforce the laws on the residency of in lieu petition circulators.  However, Arizona made the same defense in a similar case filed by the Green Party in 2009, but the judge still ruled in favor of the Green Party.  When a law prohibits someone from circulating a petition, that chills petitioning, even if the state says it doesn’t enforce the law.

South Dakota Constitution Party Files Brief in 8th Circuit

On October 18, the South Dakota Constitution Party filed this opening brief in the 8th circuit.  The only issue in the case is the state’s ban on out-of-state circulators.  The case is Constitution Party of South Dakota v Nelson.  The party is not appealing the other part of the case, on the South Dakota law that says members of some ballot-qualified parties must submit 250 signatures of party members in order to be on the party’s primary ballot for statewide office.

Another Delay in Lawsuit Over Proper Officers of the American Independent Party

On September 1, a Solano County, California Superior Court Judge had ruled that the faction of the American Independent Party that supported Alan Keyes for president in 2008 should answer the complaint in King v Robinson, 034452.  That faction has still not answered the complaint.

On October 29, the case was before a new judge, who set a hearing in early 2011 on the Keyes faction’s request that the case be dismissed, on the grounds that the defendant is Markham Robinson, and that Robinson is no longer state chair of that faction of the party.

The California Secretary of State sends a voter handbook to each voter in the state, before each state election.  The general election booklet has a page for statements from each ballot-qualified party.  The 2010 booklet statement from the American Independent Party is signed by Nathan Sorenson, Chairman.  But then that page lists Markham Robinson’s address, 476 Deodara Street, Vacaville Ca 95688.  It lists Markham Robinson’s e-mail, mark@masterplanner.com.  It lists a phone number that belongs to Robinson, 707-359-4884.  The voters handbook is available on the Secretary of State’s web page, with all that contact information.  This gives the impression that Robinson is still the de facto chair, even though he no longer officially holds that title.  UPDATE:  Markham Robinson is the new Secretary, so it makes sense that his contact information is in the pamphlet.

If the Keyes faction of the American Independent Party really believed that its officers are the legally valid officers, one would expect them to be eager to proceed with the lawsuit.  The matter is been pending for over two years with no actual evidence gathered so far.

Matt Damon Makes You Tube, Explaining New York Ballot Problem for Voters who Want to Support Working Families Party

Movie star Matt Damon has made this you tube, intended for voters who want to support the New York Working Families Party on November 2.  As has been previously noted, this year New York isn’t using mechanical voting machines; voters are voting on paper ballots.  Therefore, the Working Families Party, the Independence Party, and the Conservative Party, are all alarmed that many voters are likely to vote twice for one office, for the same candidate.  When that happens, the vote-counting machines will count those votes as valid for the party that appears first.  So anyone who votes for Andrew Cuomo, for example, as both a Democrat, and a Working Families Party nominee, will have that voted count only for the Democratic Party.

Thanks to Kimberly Wilder for the link.