Texas held its 2010 primary on March 2, and the Democratic Party did not have any candidates for Judge in the 432nd district in Fort Worth.  The Republican primary nominated Tom Zachry for that post.  However, Zachry died on March 19, 2010.

Texas election laws let the Republican Party replace Zachry with a new nominee, but the law does not let any other qualified party make a late nomination in circumstances like that.  On August 17, the Texas Democratic Party filed a lawsuit with the Texas Supreme Court, asking the Court to construe Texas election law to let it make a nomination as well.  In re Candace Taylor, 10-0635.

In 1916, the Texas Supreme Court ruled against the Democratic Party is a case somewhat like this one.  That case was Gilmore v Waples, 188 S.W. 1037.

It is inevitable that some primary winners will die after the primary, but before the general election.  However, this problem is made worse when states have primaries that are as early as March, a full eight months before the general election.  The problem is even worse in Texas, which requires all candidates (except presidential candidates) to file a declaration of candidacy in early January of any election year.

On August 17, Washington state held its top-two primary.  No minor party members qualified for the November ballot for any federal or state office, except in races in which only one major party member was running.  However, in one U.S. House race, an independent candidate did qualify for the November ballot, even though there was more than one major party member running.  That was in the 7th district, centered in Seattle.  Democratic incumbent Jim McDermott polled 78.8%.  Bob Jeffers-Schroder, whose label was “Independent-No Party” placed second with 6.9% and will be on the ballot in November.  No Republican ran in that race; the primary ballot had four Democrats and two independents.

The term “minor party” in the paragraph above means an actual organization, i.e., a group with officers, bylaws, and meetings.  It doesn’t refer to candidates who chose a “party preference” that is not a real-world organization.  Examples of such labels are:  GOP, Lower Taxes, Independent Democrat.

Here is a link to the unofficial election returns on the Secretary of State’s web page.

The Working Families has nominated Rob Groce for U.S. House in the First District, which contains Charleston.  See this story.  Groce is not the nominee of any other party.

The Working Families Party has never before run anyone for federal or state office in South Carolina who was not also the Democratic Party nominee.  In 2006, the Working Families Party had cross-endorsed two Democrats for U.S. House, and two Democrats for state legislature.  In 2008 the Working Families Party, even though ballot-qualified, did not appear on the South Carolina ballot.

This year, in the First District race, the Working Families Party had first nominated Robert Burton for in that race.  But Burton lost the Democratic primary in June 2010 to Ben Frasier.  Therefore, under state law, the WFP nomination of Burton was void.

This is the first time a ballot-qualified party in South Carolina has exercised its right to make a replacement nomination, after the first nomination was voided.  The ability of a party to make a new nomination, after its first nominee was barred, is an important gain for parties in South Carolina.  When the 4th circuit upheld the law that says a party loses a nominee if that nominee later tries and fails to get the nomination of another party, the 4th circuit justified its ruling by pointing out that the original party is not signficantly harmed by the law, because it is always free to find a new nominee.  However, until the 4th circuit said that, the State Election Commission had not allowed replacement nominations.

Rob Groce’s campaign web page is here.  Thanks to Dave Gillespie for the links.