Oklahoma Bill Easing Initiative Qualification Passes

On May 5, the Oklahoma legislature passed SJR 13. It lowers the number of signatures for initiatives, in years immediately after presidential elections. The old law says a statutory initiative needs signatures of 8% of the last vote cast. SJR 13 changes this to 8% of the last gubernatorial vote. Because so many more voters vote in presidential years than in midterm years, this has the effect of lowering the number of signatures by 30%, for initiatives meant for the midterm election. It has no effect on initiatives that try to get on the ballot in presidential years.

SJR 13 changes the Constitution, so it won’t go into effect unless the voters approve it in 2010. Thanks to Richard Prawdzienski for this news.

Washington Governor Signs Bill Letting Some Ex-Felons Register to Vote

On May 4, Washington’s Governor Christine Gregoire signed HB 1517. It permits ex-felons who still owe fines or restitution payments to register to vote. However, if they fall behind on their payments, they can lose their status as registered voters. Under the old law, ex-felons making monthly payments to pay off fines or restitution to victims had to wait until they had finished their payment, before registering to vote.

Louisiana Bill to Eliminate Primaries for Small Qualified Parties and Leave Them No Method to Nominate

Louisiana Representative Wayne Waddell (R-Shreveport) has introduced HB 776. It would deprive qualified parties of their own primary if they have fewer than 40,000 registered members.

Other states, over recent decades, have also changed their laws to eliminate primaries for small qualified parties. However, in those other states, the new law let small qualified parties nominate by convention. Louisiana’s HB 776, by contrast, leaves them no legal means to nominate candidates. If HB 776 were to pass, individual members of ballot-qualified parties would pay their filing fees and go straight to the November ballot, and if two members of the same small qualified party filed for the same position, they both would appear on the November ballot. Such a result would split that party’s vote. Thanks to Randall Hayes for this news.

Another Editorial that Parties Should Pay for Their Own Primaries

The Tulsa Beacon, April 30 issue, has this editorial, advocating that either political parties should pay for their own presidential primaries, or that the Oklahoma presidential primaries should be abolished and replaced with caucuses. The editorial notes that it costs the taxpayers $300,000 per presidential election year for the state to hold presidential primaries. The Tulsa Beacon is a print weekly.