Montana Republicans Abandon February Caucus, Will Use June Primary

The Montana Republican Party recently decided not to hold a presidential nominating caucus in February 2012. Instead the party will treat its presidential primary in June 2012 as the method for selecting delegates. See this story.

In 2008, the June presidential primary was just a “beauty contest” for Republicans, with no binding force. The 2008 Republican delegates were chosen in a February caucus.

Montana primaries have always been open. Montana has never had registration by party.

“The Monkey Cage”, Political Science Blog, Discusses California’s Proposition 14

The Monkey Cage is a political science blog established in 2007. Here is a general discussion of California’s Proposition 14, the top-two election system, or jungle primary.

The opening says Proposition 14 passed with 54% of the vote, but every indication, as more and more ballots are being counted, is that the true figure is 53%.

Ohio Libertarian Analyzes Which Kind of Voter Chose a Libertarian Primary Ballot This Year

Mark Noble, an Ohio Libertarian, has just completed a study of the voters who chose a Libertarian Party primary ballot last month, in Franklin County, Ohio. Franklin County is Ohio’s second-most populous county, and includes Columbus. In Franklin County last month, 1,351 voters chose a Libertarian primary ballot.

The analysis shows that in 2008, 22% of those voters had chosen a Republican primary ballot; that 27% had chosen a Democratic primary ballot; and that 41% had not voted in any party’s primary. Erickson hopes to do further research on this for counties other than Franklin County. In 2008, the only parties that had primaries in Ohio were the Democratic and Republican Parties.

Illinois November Ballots Will Probably List Two U.S. Senate Races This Year

On June 16, the 7th circuit released a 40-page opinion in Gerald A. Judge v Governor Pat Quinn, 09-2219. The issue was whether Illinois must hold a special election for President Obama’s old Senate seat earlier than November 2010. Even if Obama had not been elected President, his seat, the Class III seat, would have been up in November 2010 anyway.

The 7th circuit said that the U.S. District Court had been correct to deny injunctive relief, and that the plaintiffs had no right to expect a special election in 2009. But, the decision suggests that the state must hold a special election for that seat on November 2, 2010, to fill that seat for the short amount of time remaining in the current term. Thus, Illinois will probably be required not only to hold the normal election for that seat for the term January 2011-January 2017, but to also hold a simultaneous election to fill that same seat for the period November 2010 through January 2011.

Because of legal technicalities, the issue was not fully resolved, and the U.S. District Court will hold a new hearing in the case on June 23.

Maine Independent Candidate Will Sue Over Method of Delivery of Petitions to Town Clerks

Maine and several other New England states still require petitioning candidates to submit their completed petitions to various town clerks around the state. Then, after the town clerks have finished checking the petitions, the candidate or political party supporting that candidate must collect the petitions and deliver them to the Secretary of State.

This cumbersome procedure ought to be obsolete in every state, because federal legislation for some years has required each state elections office to have its own list of all registered voters in the state.

This year, in Maine, an independent gubernatorial candidate, Alex Hammer, collected almost 6,000 signatures toward the requirement of 4,000. To save time, money, and energy, he put the petitions he had collected from certain towns on his web page, using high resolution techniques for the scan (300dpi). He then asked these particular town clerks to check the signatures by examining the images.

However, the Secretary of State ruled that this method of delivery is not permitted, so Hammer is off the ballot, even though he is virtually certain to have enough valid signatures. Using the old-fashioned system of delivering signatures in person, he already has been notified that he has 3,200 valid signatures, and there are still 1,400 unchecked signatures. He expects to file a lawsuit to reverse the Secretary of State’s decision.