California League of Conservation Voters Opposes Proposition 14

The California League of Conservation Voters is opposed to Proposition 14, the top-two primary ballot measure. See the League’s recommendations on all statewide measures here.

The League has 35,000 members. The League statement on Proposition 14 says, “CLCV is opposing this measure because we believe that a top-two primary system will ultimately limit voter choices and further benefit incumbent legislators. By bringing only two candidates forward to the general election each cycle, the system will shut out participation by minor parties and make it more difficult for alternate political views to have a place in the general election discussion.”

Slate Carries Analysis, “Should Specter Have Run as an Independent?”

Last year, U.S. Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania changed his registration from Republican to Democratic, after he and others in Pennsylvania realized that he would probably lose the May 18, 2010 Republican primary.

Now, however, he is trailing in the Democratic primary. Slate has this interesting article by Steve Kornacki, asking whether Specter would have been wise to change his registration last year from Republican to independent, and to have run for re-election this year as an independent.

Ironically, in 1997, Specter tried to make Pennsylvania ballot access far more difficult. He used his influence with Pennsylvania Republican legislators (who were in the majority in both houses) to get a bill through the legislature, quadrupling the number of signatures for independent and minor party candidates. The bill passed, but fortunately Governor Tom Ridge vetoed it.

The reason Specter tried to make ballot access for independents and minor parties more difficult back in 1997 is because he was up for re-election as a Republican in 1998, and he hoped to prevent the Constitution Party from getting a candidate on the ballot against him. Specter has always been pro-choice, and he had seen how well the Constitution Party had polled in the 1994 Pennsylvania governor’s race, when the Republican Party nominee for Governor had also been pro-choice. As things turned out, Specter was overwhelmingly re-elected as a Republican in 1998. Although the Constitution Party did get on the ballot against him, it only polled 68,377 votes.

Slate Carries Analysis, "Should Specter Have Run as an Independent?"

Last year, U.S. Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania changed his registration from Republican to Democratic, after he and others in Pennsylvania realized that he would probably lose the May 18, 2010 Republican primary.

Now, however, he is trailing in the Democratic primary. Slate has this interesting article by Steve Kornacki, asking whether Specter would have been wise to change his registration last year from Republican to independent, and to have run for re-election this year as an independent.

Ironically, in 1997, Specter tried to make Pennsylvania ballot access far more difficult. He used his influence with Pennsylvania Republican legislators (who were in the majority in both houses) to get a bill through the legislature, quadrupling the number of signatures for independent and minor party candidates. The bill passed, but fortunately Governor Tom Ridge vetoed it.

The reason Specter tried to make ballot access for independents and minor parties more difficult back in 1997 is because he was up for re-election as a Republican in 1998, and he hoped to prevent the Constitution Party from getting a candidate on the ballot against him. Specter has always been pro-choice, and he had seen how well the Constitution Party had polled in the 1994 Pennsylvania governor’s race, when the Republican Party nominee for Governor had also been pro-choice. As things turned out, Specter was overwhelmingly re-elected as a Republican in 1998. Although the Constitution Party did get on the ballot against him, it only polled 68,377 votes.

Colorado Ballot Access Bill Moves Ahead

On May 10, the Colorado Senate passed HB 1271 on second reading, by a vote of 19-16. The Senate also amended it so that it takes effect immediately. The House had already passed the bill. But because the Senate amended it, it must go back to the House, and the legislature is almost ready to adjourn for the year. See this story in the Durango Herald.

HB 1271 is the bill that relaxes the prior disaffiliation law for independent candidates. Current law says an independent candidate cannot get on the ballot if the person had been registered into a qualified party at any time during the previous year before filing. The bill changes the disaffiliation rule, so that it only applies if the independent candidate had been a member of a qualified party during the election year.