California Author of Proposition 14 Has Poor Record on Voting Rights Bills

California’s Lieutenant Governor, Abel Maldonado, has made public appearances in the last few months, in which he advocates for Proposition 14 and also holds himself out as a champion of voting rights. However, his record while he was in the state legislature does not suggest that he was interested in expanding voting rights.

In 2000, he voted “No” on AB 1094, which changed the deadline for a voter to register to vote from 29 days before an election, to 15 days. The bill passed and was signed into law.

In two different legislative sessions, he voted against the National Popular Vote Plan: AB 2948 in 2006, and SB 37 in 2008. The National Popular Vote Plan, if passed by California and enough other states, would end any future occurrences at which someone could assume the presidency even though that person had polled fewer popular votes than another presidential candidate. Both bills passed the legislature but both bills were vetoed by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. A 2008 poll by the Public Policy Institute of California showed that 70% of Californians support the National Popular Vote Plan.

In 2007, he voted against SB 439, which would have provided that voter intent should control whether a write-in vote is valid. Specifically, the bill would have said that if a voter write-ins on the ballot the name of a declared write-in candidate, that vote should count, even if the voter forgot, or didn’t know, to “X” the square next to the name. The bill passed but was vetoed.

In 2007, he voted against AB 1294, which said that any general law city or county is free to use Instant Runoff Voting for its own city or county elections. Current law lets charter cities implement IRV for its own elections, but does not let general law cities or counties make this decision. The bill passed but was vetoed. All popular votes during the last ten years in California charter cities, asking the voters if they wish to use IRV for their own cities, have passed.

In 2008, he voted against AB 583, which passed and was signed into law. It provides that in June 2010, the voters vote on whether to repeal a State Constitutional ban on public funding for candidates. The existing ban applies not only to the state, but to any local government. This measure is Proposition 15. Polls indicate that it is leading.

California Proposition 16 Remains on June Ballot

On the evening of May 5, a California Superior Court tentatively ruled that California’s Proposiotion 16 should remain on the June 8 primary ballot. See this story. Proposition 16 requires jurisdictions that are switching to public power to submit the decision to a popular vote, at which two-thirds of the voters must vote “yes.”

The 18-page decision in Modesto Irrigation District v Bowen, 2010-80000478, is here.

David Orr, Long-Serving Cook County Clerk, Condemns Illinois Ballot Access Laws

David Orr has this letter to the editor in the May 5 Chicago Tribune. Orr is the County Clerk of Cook County, Illinois. He says ballot access should be eased. Orr was elected on the Democratic ticket in 1990, and he has been re-elected every four years, ever since.

I have been paying attention to publicity about ballot access for many decades, and I have never before seen so much attention paid to restrictive ballot access laws during a mid-term year. Presidential election years sometimes also provide much publicity about ballot access laws, especially in 1980, 1992, and 2000. But probably there has never been a mid-term election year in the United States in which so much attention was paid to the ballot access issue. This year, major newspapers in Alabama, Colorado, Delaware, Georgia, Illinois, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, and Pennsylvania, have publicized the issue in a supportive way.

The press in Massachusetts and New Hampshire ought to be paying attention, but newspapers in those two states seem to have a blind spot. Massachusetts ballot access to primary ballots is so bad, Massachusetts is the only non-southern state in which most legislative races usually have only one candidate on the November ballot. But no Massachusetts newspaper ever talks about this.

Thanks to Jeff Trigg for the link.

Los Angeles Times Article Says Proposition 14 “Yes” Campaign Has Millions

This Los Angeles Times story mentions that the campaign in favor of California’s Proposition 14, the “top-two” ballot measure set for the June 8 ballot, has $2,800,000 on hand. Most of it was raised from wealthy individuals and large corporations, aided by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger’s fund for ballot issues. The story also mentions that the opponents have raised very little money, and therefore backers are optimistic.

There is a vigorous campaign against Proposition 14, carried on around the state in public meetings of civic groups, and in radio debates. In 2004, when another “top-two” measure was on the California ballot, opponents raised $600,000; proponents raised several million dollars; and the measure was defeated.