The 9th circuit will hear Nader v Cronin on June 17, in Honolulu. This is the case that challenges the number of signatures needed for an independent presidential candidate in Hawaii. The basis for the lawsuit is that it is not even rational to require over 4,000 signatures for independent presidential candidates, when the state permits a fully-qualified party (with its own primary) to qualify with 663 signatures.
This is the only ballot access case from 2004 that is still unsettled, except for Nader’s lawsuit against the Democratic National Committee (pending in state court in Maine), and except for Nader’s ongoing litigation over the $81,000 he was charged in Pennsylvania in 2004.
It may seem that 4,000 signatures is a trivial burden, but that is not the case. Hawaii tends to be extremely severe when it checks petitions, and invalidates signatures if the signer shows neither the last four digits of a Social Security number, or the birthday. No independent presidential petition has succeeded in Hawaii since 1996.