Arkansas Constitution Party May Attempt 2010 Ballot Drive

According to this Arkansas politics blog, the Constitution Party is making plans to attempt to get itself on the ballot in 2010. The law requires 10,000 signatures, to be collected in any 3 months of the party’s choosing, but the signatures are due in July if the party wants to have candidates in 2010. Apparently the party is eager to run someone for Governor. Thanks to Bill Van Allen for the link.

The only minor parties that have been on the ballot in Arkansas (other than for President, which is easier) in the last 45 years have been the Green Party, the Reform Party, and the American Party. Arkansas is the only state in the nation in which no Libertarian has ever been on the ballot for a partisan office, other than President.

Florida Supreme Court Says A Single County Can Outlaw Vote-Counting Machines with no Paper Trail

On February 11, the Florida Supreme Court issued its opinion in Sarasota Alliance for Fair Elections v Browning, SC07-2074. The Court said that if a single county in Florida wants to have a local law saying vote-counting machines must have a paper trail, the county can do that. Earlier, the State Court of Appeals had ruled against Sarasota County, saying the county is not free to ban such machines. But the Supreme Court reversed the lower court.

California Top-Two Open Primary Would Increase Election Administration Costs, According to County Elections Officials

Proposition 14, on the California June 2010, proposes a top-two open primary. Several county elections officials have recently been asked to estimate whether, if passed, the measure would increase costs to taxpayers. San Diego County estimates an additional cost per election of $.75 per voter, and Sacramento County estimates an additional cost of $1.85 per voter.

One reason the costs will increase is that the counties would still need to print up separate primary ballots, intended only for members of each party, for county central committee elections. Another cost is that the implementing measure requires that each primary ballot have at the top, “Voter-Nominated and Nonpartisan Offices” in 24-point boldface gothic capital type. Then, in smaller type, the ballots must say, “All voters, regardless of the party preference they disclosed upon registration, or refusal to disclose a party preference, may vote for any candidate for a voter-nominated or nonpartisan office. Voter-Nominated Offices. The party preference, if any, designated by a candidate for a voter-nominated office is selected by the candidate and is shown for the information of the voters only. It does not constitute or imply an endorsement of the candidate by the party indicated, and no candidate nominated by the qualified voters for any voter-nominated office shall be deemed to be the officially nominated candidate of any political party. Nonpartisan Offices. A candidate for a nonpartisan office may not designate a party preference on the ballot.”

This verbiage must appear on each ballot card. It is so lengthy, it will require the counties to print more ballot cards than they would have otherwise. Also, each candidate may have next to his or her name, “My party preference is the ____ Party,” as well as the candidate’s occupation (California ballots already show the occupation of each candidate). In some counties these must be printed in multiple languages.

Activists Seeking California Legislator to Introduce Bill to Lower Number of Independent Candidate Signatures

Activists from Californians for Electoral Reform, and also others, are seeking a California legislator to introduce a bill to lower the number of signatures needed for a statewide independent candidate. Assemblyman Mike Eng already asked the Legislative Counsel to draft such a bill, so that any legislator is free to introduce it before the February 19, 2010, deadline. If you have any connection with any California legislator, please ask for such a bill. The legislative counsel analysis is RN 10 03536.

The existing statewide independent candidate petition requirement, 173,041 signatures, is unjust. No independent petition in U.S. history has ever overcome a requirement greater than 134,781 signatures. The proposed bill caps the statewide California requirement at 50,000. Other than North Carolina, California is the only state in 2010 that requires as many signatures as 50,000. In 1973 the California legislature appointed an elite commission to study the election laws, and that committee recommended 10,000 signatures for statewide nominees. The commission was headed by the President of the League of Women Voters of California and the Registrar of Voters of Alameda County. The legislature never acted on that recommendation.