Massachusetts House Passes Bill on Senate Vacancies

Late on September 17, the Massachusetts House passed HB 656 by a vote of 95-58. This is the bill that lets the Governor fill a U.S. Senate vacancy almost immediately after the seat becomes vacant. The appointee would only serve until the special election, which would normally be held five months after the vacancy occurs.

As far as is known, the Massachusetts bill (if it becomes law) will be unique among the 50 states. Generally speaking, states that call a special U.S. Senate election fairly quickly after the vacancy occurs do not also provide for a gubernatorial appointment between the date of the vacancy and the special election.

Of course, most states don’t call early special elections to fill Senate vacancies. Instead, in most states, the Governor appoints someone who serves until the next regularly-scheduled Congressional election. And, sometimes the gubernatorial appointee is even permitted to serve more than two years. For example, Robert Kennedy was killed in early June 1968, and New York law permitted the man appointed by Governor Nelson Rockefeller (Charles Goodell) to serve all the way until January 1971, more than two and one-half years.

Chris Daggett Sues New Jersey Over Discriminatory Ballot Format

On September 18, Chris Daggett, independent candidate for Governor of New Jersey in the November 2009 election, filed a lawsuit in state court, alleging that the ballot design in most New Jersey counties severely discriminates against candidates (in the general election) who are not the nominees of a qualified party. No party except the Republican and Democratic Parties has been a qualified party in New Jersey since 1920. Most counties have a column headed “Republican Party” and a column headed “Democratic Party”, and a third column (or several columns) headed “Nomination by petition.” It is easy to overlook voters in the “Nomination by Petition” column. The case is Olson v Corzine, filed in Morris County. UPDATE: Ken Kaplan, the Libertarian candidate for Governor, is a co-plaintiff. See this story.

Lawsuit Demands More Equal Population for U.S. House Districts

On September 17, a federal lawsuit was filed in the Northern District of Mississippi, charging that the extreme variation in U.S. House districts around the nation violates the 14th Amendment. Some U.S. House seats have almost twice as many inhabitants as certain other U.S. House seats. The case is Clemons v U.S. Department of Commerce, 3:09-cv-104.

One reason there is so much variation in U.S. House district population is because districts must be wholly within a single state. A possible solution for more equal districts would be to increase the number of U.S. House seats. The lawsuit alleges that the Constitution requires some solution, and suggests this one. Here is the 12-page complaint. It was filed in Mississippi because Mississippi districts tend to be more populous than the districts of most states. Thanks to Michael Warnken for the link to the complaint. The case was assigned by Judge W. Allen Pepper, a Clinton appointee.

Indiana State Appeals Court Strikes Down Voter ID Law On Equality Grounds, Based on State Constitution

On September 17, the Indiana State Court of Appeals struck down the 2005 law that requires voters at the polls to show government photo-ID with an expiration date. The vote was 3-0. Here is the 29-page decision. The case is League of Women Voters of Indiana v Rokita, 49A02-0901-cv-40.

The basis for the decision is the Indiana Constitution, which says “The General Assembly shall not grant to any citizen, or class of citizens, privileges or immunities which upon the same terms, shall not equally belong to all citizens.” The Court found that the voter ID law violates that equal protection clause in two ways: (1) absentee voters don’t need to prove their identity, so the law discriminates against voters who vote at the polls; (2) the law gives an exemption to voters who live in a state licensed care facility when that licensed care facility is the location of the polling place for that precinct, so those voters are being treated better than voters who don’t happen to live in the building that houses the polling place.

It is considered inevitable that the Indiana Secretary of State will appeal to the State Supreme Court. This decision, if it survives, is a good model for the pending North Carolina ballot access case, now pending in North Carolina’s State Court of Appeals. Both cases are similar in that federal courts had already upheld the challenged regulations, and the plaintiffs are depending on greater protections found in State Constitutions than in the U.S. Constitution. Thanks to Rick Hasen for the link.

California Bill Banning Paying Circulators on Per-Signature Basis Sent to Governor

On September 11, the California legislature sent SB 34 to Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. He has until October 12 to sign or veto it. It makes it illegal for initiative circulators to be paid on a per-signature basis. The Governor vetoed an identical bill last year.

Normally California Governors must sign or veto bills within 12 days. But Governors have more time for bills sent in the period when the legislature adjourns, such as this bill.