From Politico’s Playbook newsletter from earlier today:

SPOILER ALERT — At a pivotal virtual meeting tomorrow, No Labels members are expected to vote to jump into the presidential race — though the group won’t yet select its ticket, AP’s Thomas Beaumont and Steve Peoples report.

Strategy shift?: Notably, No Labels is no longer saying they’re trying to get on the ballot in all 50 states, as they’ve long touted as their ambition for 2024 (and which No Labels still currently says on their website), Daniel Lippman writes in. In an op-ed in the Dallas Morning News last week, No Labels honcho NANCY JACOBSON wrote, “We have a strategy to get on the majority of state ballots for an independent presidential ticket.” A No Labels spokesperson didn’t respond to a request for comment on the change.

Thanks to Politico and politicalwire.com for the heads up!

The Hill has this interview with Angela McArdle, chair of the Libertarian National Committee, about the presidential election.

On March 6, two New York Times reporters who cover politics, Shane Goldmacher and Adam Nagourney, wrote “One clear loser in California’s primary: the top-two nonpartisan primary system. They say, “It was sold on good government reform, meant to drain partisanship and promote centrist politicians. Instead, it showed itself – again – to be as vulnerable as traditional primaries to partisan gamesmanship.” See this link, although it may be behind a paywall. It is at the end of the column, the title of which is “Five Takeaways from Super Tuesday.”