U.S. Justice Department Objects to Georgia’s Voter Registration Rules

On May 29, the U.S. Department of Justice objected to Georgia rules for voter registration that were passed in 2008. Georgia is one of the states that can’t change its election laws without approval by the Voting Rights Section of the Justice Department. The 2008 Georgia rules say that when someone registers to vote, the information on that registration form is matched against Social Security records, and Georgia drivers license records, and if any discrepancy is found, the voter registration is rejected.

The Justice Department letter says that by March 2009, the state had rejected 199,606 registration forms, and that a disproportinate number of the rejected forms are minority ethnic groups. The Justice Department letter cites evidence that the vast majority of rejected voter registration forms were rejected because a single digit was accidentally transposed in a drivers license number, or a Social Security number. See this news story, which contains a link to the Justice Department’s 6-page letter of disapproval. Thanks to Rick Hasen’s Election Law Blog for the link.

Note that this issue is separate from the 2009 Georgia law that requires newly-registering voters to submit documents proving that they are citizens. The process of obtaining Justice Department approval for that law lies in the future.

No Election Law Decisions on June 1 from U.S. Supreme Court

Although the U.S. Supreme Court released two full opinions on June 1, it did not release any of the three pending election law cases. The Court only has four more days on which decisions will be released: June 8, 15, 22 and 29. Then the Court goes on summer recess.

The three pending election law decisions are: (1) Citizens United v Federal Election Commission, on federal campaign restrictions on making a movie that seems to call for the defeat of anyone running for federal office; (2) Caperton v Massey Coal Company, on how to handle the problem that in states that elect judges, one side to a lawsuit may have given very large campaign contributions to a judge hearing the case; (3) NAMUDNO v Holder, on the constitutionality of Section 5 of the federal Voting Rights Act, the section that requires certain states to get approval from the U.S. Justice Department before changing an election law.

Anti-Initiative Massachusetts Bill Has Hearing on June 3

The Massachusetts Legislature’s Joint Committee on Election Laws will hear H 559 on Wednesday, June 3. It makes it very difficult for anyone to pay a circulator of initiative petitions.

It outlaws any payment per signature, even bonuses for high productivity. It requires paid circulators to register, and to obtain credentials, which must be shown to anyone while the circulator is working. The credentials identifies the circulator. Anyone who is paid to circulate an initiative petition, and fails to register, is subject to a fine of up to $10,000. No one may register as a paid circulator who has ever been convicted of any sex offense. If anyone who has been convicted of a sex offense nevertheless registers, and is found to have violated that provision, such person may never in his or her life again register as a paid circulator. Furthermore, no one may register as a paid circulator who has been convicted of any crime whatsoever in the preceding five years.

The bill also makes it illegal for any paid circulator to work on two initiatives simultaneously. H 559 is sponsored by Rep. Garrett J. Bradley (D-Hingham).

UK Independence Party Competitive with Britain's Major Parties in June 4 Election

The British newspaper The Independent has this interview with Nigel Farage, in its June 1 issue. Farage is the leader of the UK Independence Party. That party believes the Great Britain should not be part of any European Union federal government structure. Polls show it is likely to do very well in the June 4 European Parliamentary elections, possibly even better than the Labour Party. The UK Independence Party has not yet won any seats in the British House of Commons, however. Thanks to Bill Van Allen for the link.

UK Independence Party Competitive with Britain’s Major Parties in June 4 Election

The British newspaper The Independent has this interview with Nigel Farage, in its June 1 issue. Farage is the leader of the UK Independence Party. That party believes the Great Britain should not be part of any European Union federal government structure. Polls show it is likely to do very well in the June 4 European Parliamentary elections, possibly even better than the Labour Party. The UK Independence Party has not yet won any seats in the British House of Commons, however. Thanks to Bill Van Allen for the link.