Washington Secretary of State’s Bill on “Top-Two” Advances

On February 23, the Washington Secretary of State’s bill to clean up some legal problems with the “top-two” primary advanced. The Senate Government Operations Committee passed the bill, and sent it to the Rules committee. The bill changes the vote test for a qualified party from a group that got 5% for any statewide office at the last election, to a group that got 1% for president. It also says a candidate may “prefer” any party that is either qualified, or any party that submits a petition of 100 signatures.

Tony Mauro Analysis of How Gun Rights Case May Strengthen Entire Bill of Rights

The February 24 issue of Legal Times has this interesting article by Tony Mauro, on how a pending 2nd amendment case, McDonald v Chicago, might strengthen the entire Bill of Rights, by settling that the entire Bill of Rights restricts state governments. As the article explains, the current state of the law has a piecemeal application of whether various freedoms in the Bill of Rights apply to state government or not.

New York Court Adds Candidate to Ballot on Day Before Election

On February 23, the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, restored John Tabacco to the ballot, in the special election to fill the vacant city council seat, 49th district (Staten Island). The election is February 24.

As a result, the election will be by paper ballot in that district. Tabacco had originally been removed from the ballot because he had chosen a star for his ballot logo (a logo is a simple drawing, on ballots in New York and a few other states because of the desire to help voters who can’t read). The New York law for special elections in New York city council says that candidates must choose a label that doesn’t resemble the name of a qualified party. The Board of Elections in Tabacco’s case had removed him because his logo, the star, is similar to the Democratic Party’s logo in regular elections. But the courts had then ruled in favor of Tabacco, saying that although candidates can’t use the name of a qualified party, the law doesn’t say they can’t use the logo of a qualified party. Then Tabacco had been challenged again on the grounds that he didn’t have enough signatures, and the Supreme Court, trial division, had removed him from the ballot again. But the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court put him back on again, on February 23, because it said the lower court was wrong to consider the issue of how many valid signatures he had; that should have been raised earlier. Thanks to Bill Van Allen for this news.

Ironically, although Tabacco used the Democratic Party’s logo, he is not a registered Democrat. He is registered in the Independence Party. The 49th district race now has six candidates on the ballot, four of whom are registered Democrats and two of whom are registered in the Independence Party. The other candidate registered in the Independence Party is Paul Saryian. The four Democrats are Deborah Rose, Donald Pagano, Tony Baker, and Ken Mitchell.

Oklahoma House Rules Committee May Act on Ballot Access

The Oklahoma House Rules Committee is currently thinking about Representative Charles Key’s HB 1072. That bill lowers the petition for new and previously unqualified parties from 5% of the last vote cast, to 5,000 signatures.

Key has been told informally that if he amends the bill to require a petition of 5% of the last gubernatorial vote, his bill will pass the Rules Committee. That would mean the bill caused no improvement in presidential election years, but at least it would substantially improve the requirement in mid-term years (so that the 2010 requirement would be 46,324 signatures instead of 73,134 signatures).

Ironically, even if the proposed bill passed, Oklahoma would still be the only state in the nation with a mandatory petition procedure for a new party to place its nominees on the November ballot with a party label, in excess of 3% of the last gubernatorial vote. Although there are 5% petition procedures for a fully-qualified party in Maine, Minnesota, and Rhode Island, the Maine, Minnesota and Rhode Island 5% procedures are not mandatory; groups can appear on the November ballot with their party label next to their nominees in those three states, with much easier alternate procedures. Thanks to Richard Prawdzienski for this news.