Nader Files Brief on 2004 Fees in Pennsylvania Supreme Court

On June 1, Ralph Nader filed his brief on the merits in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, on the issue of whether he should have been assessed $81,102.19 (plus interest) to pay for the costs of the procedure that removed him from the 2004 Pennsylvania ballot. Here is the brief. The brief itself is 26 pages. The case is still called In re Nomination Paper of Nader, 94 MAP 2008. The appendices include the opinion of the Commonwealth Court that refused to reconsider the issue, and all the evidence that had been submitted to the Commonwealth Court.

The brief is very strong and speaks for itself.

Nevada Legislature Passes Distribution Requirement for Initiatives

On the evening of June 1, the Nevada legislature passed SB 212, which provides for a distribution requirement for statewide initiatives. For 2010, the bill would provide that a substantial number of signatures come from each of the three U.S. House districts. Afterwards, the legislature will be drawing an unspecified number of districts that apply only to the initiative petition procedure.

Most states with the initiative do not have distribution requirements. When a bill passes a legislature, no one worries about whether the legislators who vote for the bill represent all sections of the state. The only thing that matters is whether it receives a majority of the vote in that legislative chamber. Also, when a bill is introduced in a legislature, no state requires that the bill be co-sponsored by legislators from diverse ends of the state. By analogy, then, one wonders why only initiatives are required to show support in all ends of a state.

New York Times Carries Op-Ed by Bob Barr

The June 1 print issue of the New York Times has this op-ed by Bob Barr, Libertarian Party presidential nominee last year. Barr argues that the U.S. Supreme Court should honor the habeas corpus petition filed by Troy Davis, who is on death row in Georgia. Unless the U.S. Supreme Court intervenes, Georgia could set an execution date at any time. Barr says in the op-ed he is pro-death penalty but he points out that no court has heard the latest evidence that Davis is innocent.

San Jose Elections Commission Pondering Instant Runoff Voting

San Jose, the 10th most populous city in the United States, is considering using Instant-Runoff Voting for its own elections. Since it is a charter city, under California law, it is free to do this if it wishes. The San Jose Elections Commission will discuss IRV at its June 10 meeting. On June 11, the New America Foundation and Common Cause are sponsoring a panel discussion about IRV, featuring two city council members, Sam Liccardo and Ash Kalra. It is between noon and 1:15 pm in room 225 of the Martin Luther King Jr. Public Library at 150 E. San Fernando Street in downtown San Jose. The meeting is free and lunch is furnished.

To implement IRV, the city council would need to place a charter amendment on the ballot. If San Jose were to implement IRV, it would be the most populous jurisdiction using IRV in the U.S. Thanks to Blair Bobier for this news.