Montana Bill for Run-off Elections Gets a Tie Vote in Senate

On February 10, the Montana Senate voted on the proposal to amend the State Constitution and require a majority vote before anyone can be elected. The result was a 25-25 tie. Since the bill is a proposed Constitutional amendment, under Montana legislative rules, it now goes to the House even though it didn’t pass the Senate. However, it must pass in the House with a two-thirds vote, so its chances are dim. See this news story, which quotes former Secretary of State Mike Cooney, who is now a State Senator, criticizing both ordinary run-offs and Instant Runoff Voting.

Although the news story says the bill applies to state and local office, it actually also applies to federal office.

Georgia Bill to Ban Out-of-State Helpers in Voter Registration Drives

A bill has been introduced in the Georgia House to make it illegal for people to work on voter registration drives, unless they are registered voters in Georgia. It is HB 225, by five Republican representatives: Ed Rynders, Jeff May, Jay Roberts, Edward Lindsey, and Tom Rice.

Specifically, the bill says, “Voter registration applications shall be distributed only by persons who are registered voters of this state and voter registration drives shall be conducted only by persons who are registered voters of this state.”

The bill, if enacted, would probably be unconstitutional under the U.S. Supreme Court opinion Buckley v American Constitutional Law Foundation. That 1999 decision said states cannot require petition circulators to be registered voters. Presumably the First Amendment principles involving petition circulators also apply to people engaged in asking people if they wish to fill out a voter registration form.

New York Anti-Fusion Bill

New York Assemblyman David Gantt (D-Rochester) has introduced a bill to prohibit two parties from jointly nominating the same candidate. The bill is A2399. It makes an exception for judicial candidates, and would continue to allow multiple parties to cross-endorse the same judicial nominees.