Libertarian Louisiana Presidential Case is Still Pending

The Libertarian Party’s lawsuit against Louisiana for keeping Bob Barr off the ballot last month is still alive and active. Here is the party’s 43-page brief, filed on December 8 in the 5th circuit. One little-known fact about this case is that both the Democratic and Republican Parties also failed to file their presidential elector candidates by the statutory deadline, September 2. The Secretary of State created a new deadline (September 8) by fiat, but the case argues that under Article II, only state legislatures can create election laws.

Indiana Activists Need Quick Action

If you are concerned about Indiana ballot access, it is important to know that bills must be introduced only four session days after the legislature convenes on January 7.

Indiana ballot access is among the worst in the nation. For the last three presidential elections, the presidential candidate who placed third nationally has not been on the ballot in Indiana. That candidate, of course, is Ralph Nader. Indiana is one of only 4 states in which Nader’s name has never been on the ballot. Of all the states with really bad ballot access, Indiana and Texas are the only ones with no ballot access lawsuits pending. Therefore, any improvement in those two states must be by persuading state legislators to improve the laws. In Texas, legislators may introduce bills as late as March 13, 2009.

9th Circuit Won’t Rehear Alaskan Independence Party Case

On December 17, the 9th circuit denied a rehearing en banc in Alaskan Independence Party v State of Alaska, 07-35186. The issue was whether a political party’s freedom of association extends to controlling who can run in its primary. The original decision on October 6 sided with the state, but didn’t really grapple with the constitutional issues involved, and seemed to think the case was about whether the government can require parties to nominate by primary. It is possible the Alaskan Independence Party will ask for U.S. Supreme Court review.

9th Circuit Won't Rehear Alaskan Independence Party Case

On December 17, the 9th circuit denied a rehearing en banc in Alaskan Independence Party v State of Alaska, 07-35186. The issue was whether a political party’s freedom of association extends to controlling who can run in its primary. The original decision on October 6 sided with the state, but didn’t really grapple with the constitutional issues involved, and seemed to think the case was about whether the government can require parties to nominate by primary. It is possible the Alaskan Independence Party will ask for U.S. Supreme Court review.

Status of Two Pending Cases on Petitioning on Post Office Sidewalks

At least two lawsuits are pending over the Post Office’s regulation that bans petitioning on interior Post Office sidewalks. The case filed in 2000 is still in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., but is likely to have an opinion soon. That case is Initiative & Referendum Institute v U.S. Postal Service, 00-cv-1246.

The other case is Del Gallo v Parent, 08-1511. It had a hearing in the 1st circuit on December 1. One of the three judges seemed favorable to the post office regulation; one judge seemed favorable to the plaintiff (who was petitioning to get on the Massachusetts Republican primary ballot); and one judge didn’t seem to reveal his thoughts. The case arose in Pittsfield, Massachusetts. A decision in this case is probably several months away.