California Libertarian Showing for Legislature Best in Party's History

The California Libertarian Party has been on the ballot in all elections starting with 1980. In the November 2008 election, it polled a higher share of the vote for its Assembly candidates (in the districts in which it had Assembly candidates) than ever before in its history. Even though all of the party’s 2008 Assembly candidates had both a Democratic and a Republican opponent, the party’s share of the vote in the districts in which it ran Assembly candidates was 6.87%.

California Libertarians running for U.S. House also did relatively well, receiving 4.33% of the vote in the districts which had Libertarians running. Excluding districts with only one major party candidate, that was the best showing for U.S. House for California Libertarians since 1992.

Pamela J. Brown, Assembly candidate in 2008 in the 40th district (San Fernando Valley), polled 14.76% against both a Democrat and a Republican. That was only the second time in the history of the California Libertarian Party that one of its nominees in a partisan race (with both major parties in that race) had exceeded 10%. The other instance was in 1980, when Roberta Rinehart polled 16.78% for Assembly in the 70th district (Anaheim).

California Libertarian Showing for Legislature Best in Party’s History

The California Libertarian Party has been on the ballot in all elections starting with 1980. In the November 2008 election, it polled a higher share of the vote for its Assembly candidates (in the districts in which it had Assembly candidates) than ever before in its history. Even though all of the party’s 2008 Assembly candidates had both a Democratic and a Republican opponent, the party’s share of the vote in the districts in which it ran Assembly candidates was 6.87%.

California Libertarians running for U.S. House also did relatively well, receiving 4.33% of the vote in the districts which had Libertarians running. Excluding districts with only one major party candidate, that was the best showing for U.S. House for California Libertarians since 1992.

Pamela J. Brown, Assembly candidate in 2008 in the 40th district (San Fernando Valley), polled 14.76% against both a Democrat and a Republican. That was only the second time in the history of the California Libertarian Party that one of its nominees in a partisan race (with both major parties in that race) had exceeded 10%. The other instance was in 1980, when Roberta Rinehart polled 16.78% for Assembly in the 70th district (Anaheim).

Illinois Bill for a June Primary

On January 16, Illinois Republican State Senator Dale Risinger (R-Peoria) introduced SB 46, to move the Illinois primary from February to June, in all even-numbered years.

Illinois has never been one of the states that has an early presidential primary, and then a later primary for other office. Illinois has always had just one primary per year, for all federal and state offices. The Illinois primary had always been in April, until 1965, when it was moved to June. But in 1969 it was moved to March, and in 2007 it was moved to February. The 2008 Illinois February primary was the earliest congressional primary in any state, in U.S. history. Many observers felt it was absurd for a state to hold a congressional primary that was at virtually the half-way point for a normal term for a member of the U.S. House.

The 1968 Illinois presidential primary, the only late presidential primary Illinois ever held, was one of the most interesting presidential primaries that year. It was the only presidential primary held after Senator Bobby Kennedy had been killed. Eugene McCarthy won the Illinois presidential primary, defeating Hubert Humphrey and Teddy Kennedy at the June 11 event. All votes in that presidential primary were write-in votes.

Out-of-State Circulator Sues Idaho

On January 16, Donald N. Daien filed a federal lawsuit against the Idaho law that makes it a crime for him to circulate a petition in that state. Daien lives in Arizona. Daien had wanted to volunteer to help Ralph Nader get on the Idaho ballot in 2008, and says he wants to help similar candidates in the future. Daien v Ysursa, 1:09cv-00022.

Idaho is in the 9th circuit. The Idaho law not only makes signatures collected by out-of-state circulators invalid, it subjects the out-of-state circulator to criminal prosecution. Thus Idaho’s law is even harsher than Arizona’s law, which contains no criminal penalties.