Oregon "Top-Two" Initiative Backers Submit 92,000 Signatures

On May 23, backer’s of Oregon’s initiative to establish a “top-two” system submitted 92,000 signatures. They need 82,579. The signatures will now be checked, and if the initiative needs additional signatures, the group has until July 3 to obtain more. Hence, it is extremely likely that the initiative will be on the November 2008 Oregon ballot.

Like similar initiatives in California and Washington in 2004, the Oregon initiative provides that all candidates would appear on the primary ballot, and all voters would get identical primary ballots. Then, only the two vote-getters with the most votes could be on the November ballot. The initiative does not apply to president.

The Oregon initiative provides that the candidate’s registration should be printed on the May ballot. If the candidate is endorsed by any particular ballot-qualified party, that information will also be on the May ballot. However, the only parties that can be mentioned on the ballot are those that meet the definition of “political party”, which is a group that polled 1% of the vote in the last election for a statewide office, or a group with registration of one-half of 1%, or a group that recently submitted a petition of 1.5% of the last gubernatorial vote. The Oregon initiative is therefore much more confining than the Washington state law, in which a candidate can choose any partisan label that is under 17 characters and is not obscene. Under the Oregon initiative, if a candidate is registered as a Socialist, “Socialist” will not be printed on the May ballot, since the Socialist Party is not a qualified party.

Oregon “Top-Two” Initiative Backers Submit 92,000 Signatures

On May 23, backer’s of Oregon’s initiative to establish a “top-two” system submitted 92,000 signatures. They need 82,579. The signatures will now be checked, and if the initiative needs additional signatures, the group has until July 3 to obtain more. Hence, it is extremely likely that the initiative will be on the November 2008 Oregon ballot.

Like similar initiatives in California and Washington in 2004, the Oregon initiative provides that all candidates would appear on the primary ballot, and all voters would get identical primary ballots. Then, only the two vote-getters with the most votes could be on the November ballot. The initiative does not apply to president.

The Oregon initiative provides that the candidate’s registration should be printed on the May ballot. If the candidate is endorsed by any particular ballot-qualified party, that information will also be on the May ballot. However, the only parties that can be mentioned on the ballot are those that meet the definition of “political party”, which is a group that polled 1% of the vote in the last election for a statewide office, or a group with registration of one-half of 1%, or a group that recently submitted a petition of 1.5% of the last gubernatorial vote. The Oregon initiative is therefore much more confining than the Washington state law, in which a candidate can choose any partisan label that is under 17 characters and is not obscene. Under the Oregon initiative, if a candidate is registered as a Socialist, “Socialist” will not be printed on the May ballot, since the Socialist Party is not a qualified party.

Illinois Bill to Make Party Nominations More Difficult Seems Dead

Illinois House Bill 5263 appears to have failed to get out of the Local Government Committee by the May 22 deadline. The bill would have made it far more difficult for ballot-qualified parties to nominate candidates. The bill is dead unless the Rules Committee gives it a waiver, which is unlikely.

Another Illinois bill, which would restore the straight-ticket device, is still in the House Rules Committee. It is HB 2673. Its deadline to get out of Committee has been extended until May 31.

Two Florida Lawsuits Pending Over Democratic Delegates

Two federal courts in Florida are dealing with lawsuits by Florida Democrats, against the Democratic National Committee, over Florida’s lack of representation at the national convention. DiMaio v Democratic National Committee, which had been filed in August 2007, has a hearing in U.S. District Court, Middle District, on May 28. The plaintiff is a Florida Democratic voter. The case has already been to the 11th circuit, which found a procedural error, so technically this is the new DiMaio case, not the original case. 8:08cv-672T.

The other case was filed May 22 by three delegates to the national convention, State Senator Steve Geller (who is an uncommitted superdelegate), Barbara Effman (who is for Hillary Clinton) and Percy Johnson (who is for Barack Obama). It is Geller v Democratic National Committee, 08-cv-60774, southern district, in Miami.

C-SPAN will Cover Important Parts of Libertarian Convention Live

C-SPAN will broadcast coverage of the national Libertarian Party convention live, for the most exciting parts. That includes Saturday evening (9 PM eastern through midnight, which should include debates among the presidential candidates), and Sunday 10:30 AM eastern, all day (which will include the presidential voting). Thanks to Austin Cassidy’s new Independent Political Report for this news.