Cindy Sheehan Begins Independent Petition to Run for Congress

On April 24, peace activist Cindy Sheehan began her drive to collect 10,198 valid signatures, to get on the ballot as an independent candidate for U.S. House in San Francisco. She garnered considerable publicity; see here for the San Francisco Chronicle story.

California has one of the strictest laws in the nation for independent candidates for U.S. House. No one has qualified for that office as an independent since 1996, when Steven Wheeler qualified in the 22nd district (Monterey area). Sheehan had an alternate path to the November ballot. She could have been a write-in candidate in the Green Party’s primary, or the Peace & Freedom Party primary. She would have needed 1,847 write-ins to win either of those nominations (she couldn’t appear on either of those parties’ primary ballot because of her prior registration history). She chose the independent petition method, either because she perceived it is easier, or because she is more comfortable as an Independent than as a Green or Peace & Freedom nominee.

Ohio Secretary of State Refuses to Put Ohio Libertarian Party on Ballot

On April 24, the Ohio Secretary of State said that it will not put the Libertarian Party on the ballot this year. In 2006 the 6th circuit had ruled that the old law, requiring a petition of 1% of the last vote cast, due an entire year before the general election, is unconstitutional. The Ohio legislature has not replaced the old, void law, with a new one.

To fill the gap in the law, last year the Ohio Secretary of State said she would accept party petitions if they were submitted in late November 2007, and if they had the signatures of one-half of 1% of the last vote cast (slightly more than 20,000 signatures). No group complied with this task. The only group that even tried to qualify as a party was the Libertarian Party, which submitted 6,500 signatures on the day before the March primary. The party believes that when a ballot access law is unconstitutional, and the legislature doesn’t pass a new requirement, then a state is obliged to put any party or any candidate on the ballot, if that party or candidate demonstrates a modicum of support.

The party rests its opinion on the U.S. Supreme Court opinion McCarthy v Briscoe. In that case, the U.S. Supreme Court said that since Texas did not have any procedure for an independent presidential candidate to get on the ballot, Texas must put McCarthy on the ballot even though he hadn’t submitted any petition at all. The Court noted public opinion polls, and ballot status for McCarthy in other states, to justify putting McCarthy on the ballot.

Ohio is in the 6th circuit. The 6th circuit issued a similar opinion in 1984 called Goldman-Frankie v Austin. It said the lower court had been correct to order the Michigan Secretary of State to put Peggy Goldman-Frankie on the ballot as an independent candidate for State Board of Education, since Michigan did not have a valid law in place.

The Ohio Secretary of State did not say why she is not influenced by McCarthy v Briscoe or Goldman-Frankie v Austin. It is likely that the party will bring a lawsuit. It nominated by convention earlier this year and has certified the names of its candidates for U.S. House and state legislature.

Mainstream Media is Slow to Report Constitution Party Result

Two hours after Chuck Baldwin defeated Alan Keyes for the Constitution Party nomination, no mainstream media has yet posted this news to a web page, not even the Kansas City press (the convention is in Kansas City). The only media that has reported it so far is Lew Rockwell.com, ThirdPartyWatch and this site. UPDATE: The Kansas City Star has now publicized the outcome; see this.