Alan Keyes’ Illinois Petitions Challenged

Alan Keyes submitted fewer than 200 signatures to be on the Illinois Republican presidential primary. State law requires 3,000 signatures. But Illinois also says that all petitions are deemed valid unless someone challenges them.

Richard B. Mayers, a White Supremacist, challenged Keyes’ petitions. However, Mayers withdrew his own voter registration a few days before he filed the challenge. The Illinois State Board of Elections will determine on December 21, starting at 10:30 am, what to do about the Mayers’ challenge. Illinois law says only registered voters may challenge petitions.

Kucinich, Hunter Certified for Primary Season Matching Funds

On December 20, the Federal Election Commission determined that Duncan Hunter and Dennis Kucinich qualify for primary season matching funds. The FEC also set the amounts that each of the 7 candidates will receive next year in the FEC’s first payment of such funds.

The amounts for Democrats will be: John Edwards $8,800,000; Chris Dodd $1,400,000; Joe Biden $857,000; Dennis Kucinich $100,000. For Republicans, John McCain $5,800,000; Tom Tancredo $2,100,000; Duncan Hunter $100,000.

These leading candidates have not sought matching funds: Republicans Rudy Guiliani, Mike Huckabee, Ron Paul, Mitt Romney, and Fred Thompson; and Democrats Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and Bill Richardson.

Although Tom Tancredo withdrew on December 20, it does not necessarily follow that he can’t receive primary season matching funds, although the issue is unclear. If he had waited until January, he clearly would have been entitled to the funds.

Florida Hearing Set in Case to Delay Democratic Primary

On December 19, U.S. District Court Judge Hinkle of Tallahassee, Florida, ordered that all briefs be submitted to him by December 28, in Ausman v Browning. This is the case in which a Democratic voter is asking that the date of the Florida presidential primary be declared unconstitutional, since the date is responsible for Democrats losing all their voice in the national convention. The judge will hold a hearing on January 3, 2008, in this case, if he feels the need for it. Or, he may rule after reading the briefs.

Only Two Weeks Remain for New and Unqualified Parties to Tell Texas They Intend to Petition

Any party that is not now on the Texas ballot, and wishes to be on the ballot in 2008, must tell the Texas Secretary of State no later than January 2, 2008. That deadline is only two weeks away, and so far only the Green Party has filed the necessary form. The Libertarian Party is not affected since it is already on the Texas ballot.

This advance notice law was passed in 1993. It is probably unconstitutional, but no one has ever challenged it. It effectively makes it impossible for a new party to be organized in an election year. Of course, the only group that would have standing to challenge the law would be a party that was formed in an election year (i.e., an even-numbered year). The last time a new national party was formed in an even-numbered year, and which tried to get on ballots in the year it was formed, was 1992, when the Natural Law Party was formed in April.

Past parties of great significance that were not formed until an even-numbered year, and which tried to run candidates in the year they were formed, were the Republican Party in 1854, and the Progressive Party of 1912.

Nader Lawsuit Against Democratic National Committee Transferred from D.C. Court to Federal Court

One of Ralph Nader’s two lawsuits against the Democratic National Committee has been transferred from District of Columbia Superior Court, to U.S. District Court in D.C. The D.C. Superior Court is somewhat analogous to a lower state court, if D.C. were a state.

The Democratic National Committee arranged for the transfer. The Democratic National Committee may also have the other Nader lawsuit (the one filed in U.S. District Court in Virginia) merged in with the new federal case in D.C. The new federal case in D.C. is before Judge Ricardo Urbina, a Clinton appointee. It is Nader v Democratic National Committee, 07-2136.