District Electoral College Bill Passes North Carolina House on 2nd Reading

On July 26, the North Carolina House passed SB 353 on second reading by a vote of 62-47. It provides that each U.S. House district will choose its own presidential elector. The bill will probably pass on 3rd reading by the same margin, very soon. If this bill had been in effect in North Carolina in 2000, Al Gore would have more votes in the electoral college than George Bush would have won. This is because Gore carried three U.S. House districts in North Carolina (the 1st, 4th and 12th districts), so Gore would have had 3 electoral votes from North Carolina and Bush would have had 3 fewer electoral votes from that state. The national total would then have been Gore 269, Bush 268, one abstention from the District of Columbia. It is likely the D.C. elector who abstained in 2000 would have voted for Gore, since she was a Democrat.

U.S. Supreme Court Asked to Hear Another Election Law Case

On July 19, the city of Modesto, California, asked the U.S. Supreme Court to hear City of Modesto v Sanchez, 07-88. The city argues that the California Voting Rights Act violates the U.S. Constitution. The California Voting Rights Act requires Modesto to stop using winner-take-all citywide elections to choose its 5-member city council. Since 1911, only one Hispanic city councilmember has been elected in Modesto, even though 25% of the city’s population is Hispanic. That fact pattern triggers the state law. The state law will force the city to use another election system, unless the city can persuade the U.S. Supreme Court that the California law violates the 14th amendment.

Setback for Washington State Ex-Felon Voting

Washington state lets ex-felons register to vote, if they have been released and if they have paid all fines and made all court-ordered restitution payments. On July 26, the Washington State Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that nothing in the state or federal constitutions provides any relief for ex-felons who have not paid their fines or restitutions because they can’t afford to do so.

The case is Madison v State, no. 78598-8. The plaintiffs had argued that the effect of the law (requiring that fines and restitutions be paid before an ex-felon may register) amounts to a poll tax. The U.S. Supreme Court had struck down poll taxes in 1966. The Washington State Supreme Court rejected this analogy, saying that since ex-felons have no constitutional right to register to vote anyway, they cannot complain. The Washington State Constitution says “Elections Shall be Free and Equal” but the Court said that is irrelevant. Most state constitutions say “Elections shall be free and equal”, but state courts rarely seem to think that phrase means anything.

North Carolina Bill for District Selection of Presidential Electors Makes Headway

On July 25, the North Carolina House Election Law & Campaign Finance Committee passed SB 353. It provides that each U.S. House district in North Carolina would elect its own presidential elector. The bill had passed the Senate on May 24. It is likely to receive a vote in the House on July 26. The bill passed on a party-line vote, with Democrats voting “yes” and Republicans voting “no.” Thanks to Rick Hasen for this news.

The only states that currently let each U.S. House district choose its own presidential elector are Nebraska and Maine.