Michigan Presidential Primary Bills Advance

On July 18, the Michigan Senate Campaigns & Elections Committee passed both SB624 and SB625. They both set up presidential primaries in which voters would need to request a primary ballot, and each party would receive a list of voters who had chosen that party’s primary ballot.

This is a change from past Michigan presidential primaries, in which voters decided in the secrecy of the voting booth which presidential primary to vote in. In recent years Democrats have not even held a presidential primary in Michigan, because national party rules forbid that type of presidential primary.

SB624 and SB625 are identical, except that SB624 sets up a January 29 primary date, whereas SB625 sets up a February 5 date. However, both bills give the two major parties flexibility to move the date of the presidential primary, if they both agree. Also, both bills make it more difficult for a party to qualify for its own presidential primary. Existing law provides a presidential primary for any party that got 5% of the vote for president in the last election, in the entire U.S. These bills change that to 25% within Michigan.

Woodbury County, Iowa, Will Hold Presidential Primary in August 2007

Woodbury County (Iowa) Auditor Pat Gill says that the county will hold a presidential primary at the county fair, August 1-5, 2007. Mr. Gill is not available for questions on July 18. The obvious question for him (which no one else in that office can answer) is how the county will decide which candidates to list on the ballots. It is hoped he will be available on July 19 to answer this question. The state of Iowa has never held a presidential primary, so obviously nothing in the state election code can deal with this question. UPDATE: Woodbury County will list the 8 Democrats who have participated in debates this year, and the 10 Republicans who have participated in debates this year, on its presidential primary ballots. Also, for the Republican ballot, the county will include Fred Thompson, and will probably delete Jim Gilmore.

Nader Arizona Case Likely to be Argued in 9th Circuit in October

The 9th circuit is likely to hear Nader v Brewer in October 2007. This is the case over whether Arizona’s early June petition deadline is too early for independent presidential candidates, and whether it is unconstitutional for a state to ban out-of-state petitioners for independent presidential candidates.

Other 2004 Nader ballot access cases that are still pending are in Ohio (over whether the state may require circulators to be registered voters), and in Hawaii (over whether the state’s petition-checking procedures violate due process, and also over whether it is constitutional for a state to require 6 times as many signatures for an independent presidential candidate as for an entire new party).

Georgia Special Congressional Run-Off

On July 17, Georgia held a special run-off congressional election to fill the vacancy in the 10th district. Because Georgia uses the “top-two” system for special elections, and because two Republicans placed first and second last month in the first round, the July 17 run-off was between two Republicans, Jim Whitehead and Paul Broun.

With 99% of the vote counted, Broun has 23,314 votes and Whitehead has 23,120. There will be a recount. The turnout was very low; in November 2006 the vote had been Charlie Norwood (Republican) 117,721; Terry Holley (Democratic) 57,032.

Although both Whitehead and Broun are Republicans, Broun had campaigned to get Democratic and independent votes, saying that since virtually all leaders of the Republican Party supported Whitehead, that Whitehead would be a rubber stamp. Also Broun’s father had been a Democratic State Senator.