Democratic 8-Candidate Debate Gets High Marks

The 8-candidate Democratic presidential debate held on April 26 has received a great deal of press coverage. The consensus seems to be that having that many candidates did not spoil the debate. The debate was 90 minutes long. Although not every candidate received an equal amount of time, every candidate was able to give a clear impression of himself or herself. The New York Times of April 27 ran a separate article on Mike Gravel’s performance. Of the eight candidates, Gravel was considered the least likely to be nominated, but the article says “If Mr. Gravel, 77, did not steal the show, he certainly stole some of the limited sound-bite pie…He served as a kind of cranky uncle in the solemn field of well-barbered, sound-bite practitioners with whom he shared the stage, joining the other long shot, Representative Dennis J. Kucinich, in berating the others as being too cautious in trying to get troops out of Iraq.”

An organization called Rock the Debates is organizing, and hopes to create a large number of ordinary people who live in states like Iowa and New Hampshire to ask the leading major party presidential candidates if they will commit to at least one general election debate that includes all the candidates who are on the ballot in enough states to theoretically win the election. Rock the Debates efforts will be encouraged by the example of the April 26 debate. Never before in U.S. history have there been more than 7 presidential candidates in the general election who were on the ballot in enough states to win, so an inclusive general election debate would be practical.

Restrictive Missouri Deadline Bill Passes Senate Committee

On April 26, the Missouri Senate Financial, Government Organization & Elections Committee passed HB 894, by a vote of 3-2. The 3 Republicans voted “Yes”; the 2 Democrats voted “No.” That is unusual, since the sponsor is a Democrat.

HB 894 requires all independent candidates to file a declaration of candidacy in March. The bill doesn’t even exclude presidential independents. That part of the bill is definitely unconstitutional, under the 1983 U.S. Supreme Court decision Anderson v Celebrezze. Furthermore, the so-called rationale, to treat all candidates equally (in Missouri, members of qualified parties must file in March to run in the August primary) will not be realized. New party petitions aren’t due until late July, and neither this bill or any other bill proposes to require the candidates of new parties to file any declaration of candidacy in March.

The bill has already passed the House. Thanks to Ken Bush for this news.

Vermont Senate Again Passes Instant Runoff Bill

As expected, on April 26, the Vermont Senate passed SB108 on third (final) reading. This time the vote was 16-12. It had passed on April 25 on 2nd reading. As noted, it only applies to the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House race.

If it doesn’t pass the House this year, it can pass next year, since Vermont has 2-year legislative sessions. But if it passes this year, it would take effect in 2008.