Oklahoma Legislature Doesn’t Move Election Reform Bills

The Oklahoma legislature will adjourn on May 25. It appears that the only election law bill of any interest that is likely to pass this year is HB 2095, which moves the presidential primary to January 29. It passed the House on March 7 and will probably pass the Senate before adjournment. Thanks to the poster below for improving the accuracy of this item.

Bills to ease ballot access, to eliminate the straight-ticket device, and to implement the National Popular Vote Plan for presidential elections, are unlikely to pass.

Republicans Win Delaware Special Legislative Election

On May 5, Delaware held a special election to fill the vacant seat in the House, 41st district. The results were: Gregory Hastings, Republican, 42.8%; Lynn Bullock, Democrat, 38.1%; John Atkins, write-in, 12.9%; John Burton, Independent Party, 6.2%.

The same seat in November 2006 voted this way: Republican 62.7%; Democratic 35.1%; Independent Party 2.2%.

Ohio Secretary of State Begins Work on New Party Law

The Legal Affairs Director for the Ohio Secretary of State, Laurel Beatty, has scheduled a June 5 meeting, to discuss emergency regulations on how new political parties qualify for the ballot. The old law was declared unconstitutional last year. No bills are pending in the legislature to replace the old law. Therefore, the Secretary of State will probably draw up a regulation for a temporary replacement for the old law. The old law required a petition signed by 1% of the last vote cast, due 4 months before the primary. The 6th circuit determined that it is too harsh, given that no groups had used it since 2000.

Scotland Parliamentary Election

The May 3 Scotland Parliamentary Election used a mixture of single-member constituencies and proportional representation. 129 seats were up. 73 members were elected from districts, the old-fashioned way that has always been used in the U.S. (in other words, whichever candidate gets the most votes, is elected). The other 56 seats were filled proportionately.

Voters voted for a district member. Then, in a different part of the ballot, they voted for their favorite party, for the non-district seats. The results: Labor received 37 district seats but only 9 more proportionate seats, for a total of 46. The Scottish National Party won 21 district seats but 26 more seats from the proportionate part of the ballot, for a total of 47. The Conservative Party won only 4 district seats, but 13 more proportionate seats. The Liberal Democrats won 11 district seats and 5 more proportionate seats. The Green Party won 2 seats, and one independent was elected.

Even though the Scotland Parliamentary elections had used this same system in 2003, this time there was confusion. Whereas in 2003 there had been one ballot for the district seats and one district for the at-large seats, this time there was only one ballot for both types of seats. Unfortunately, the directions said “vote twice”. The people who wrote the directions meant to explain to voters to vote both for a district seat, and an at-large seat. But some voters tried to vote for 2 candidates for a district seat, or tried to make 2 choices for the at-large seats. Approximately 100,000 ballots were spoiled.

Completely separate from the Parliamentary election, were elections for local council, held all over Great Britain except for London. In Scotland, these elections used Single Transferrable Vote, which had not been used in Scotland before. It worked well.

Notes on May 3 Republican Debate

The Simi Valley Republican presidential debate of May 3 did not cover any matters concerning voting rights or election law, except that each of the 10 presidential candidates was asked about changing the U.S. Constitution to let foreign-born citizens run for President. Rudy Giuliani and Mike Huckabee said “yes”, and John McCain said he is undecided. The others said “no.”

Ron Paul did not utter the word “libertarian”, yet the press coverage of the debate consistently described him with that adjective. The Boston Globe said he is a “fiery libertarian”; Newsweek says he is a “Libertarian Republican”; National Review Online mentioned his “non-interventionist libertarian position”; Bloomberg.com says Paul “echoed the libertarian themes on warrantless searches and foreign policy”; the New York Sun said Paul is a “pure libertarian”; the Long Island Press said Paul is “a one-time Libertarian Party presidential nominee”; the Brazosport Facts (a newspaper in Paul’s district) referred to his “libertarian views”; the Ventura County Star called him “a libertarian who voted against the Iraq war at the outset.” It is almost as though the Libertarian Party was represented in the debate, at least for those voters who are reading the press on May 4.