For the second election in a row, the New Hampshire Libertarian statewide petition has failed to obtain enough valid signatures. The party’s candidate for Governor will not appear on the ballot. He needed 3,000 and lacked 350 valid. The party’s candidate for US House in the 2nd district, and three legislative candidates, did have enough valid signatures.

The New Hampshire Supreme Court is currently pondering whether the state’s ballot access procedures violate the State Constitution. Although 3,000 signatures sounds easy, New Hampshire requires petitioning groups to submit signatures to each town clerk, and then requires the petitioning groups to collect the checked signatures and transport them to the Secretary of State. The logistics of all this transportation adds to the difficulty of the process.

On September 6, the 6th circuit declared the Ohio new party procedures unconstitutional. The vote was 2-1. The case is Libertarian Party of Ohio v Blackwell, 04-4215.

Ohio requires new parties to nominate by primary. Since the primary in presidential years is in March, the new party petition is in November of the year before the election. The majority said the combination of the relatively high number of signatures (1% of the last gubernatorial vote was 32,290 signatures in 2004) plus the extremely early deadline, taken together, is unconstitutional. No minor parties appeared on the ballot in Ohio in 2002, 2004, or 2006 (instead, minor party nominees use the easier independent candidate procedure, but that procedure doesn’t permit party labels).

The other part of the case involved whether the state violated due process when it invalidated the party’s 2003 petition because the wording on the form had changed after the petition drive had begun. The state did not tell the Ohio Libertarian Party that the petition forms were outdated. The state rejected the petition because it said “The penalty for election falsification is imprisonment for six months”, and it should have said, “Whoever commits election falsification is guilty of a felony of the 5th degree”. The irony of this case is that if the state had not treated the Libertarian Party so badly, this lawsuit would not have existed. As to that part of the case, only one judge felt the state’s behavior violated due process. The judge who wrote the majority decision felt that issue was moot. The third judge, who wanted to uphold the law, also said this issue was moot.

The Ohio Libertarian Party paid the legal costs for the part of the case that was in U.S. District Court. COFOE (the Coalition for Free & Open Elections) paid for the appeal of the case. If you are a member of COFOE, your contributions helped make this outcome possible, so thank you!

Michael Toner, chair of the Federal Election Commission, appeared for an hour on C-SPAN on August 30, answering questions from viewers. A viewer from Lamar, Missouri, asked Toner about the treatment of minor party and independent presidential candidates. In response, Toner strongly condemned states that require hundreds of thousands of signatures for minor parties and independent candidates to get on the ballot. He emphasized how different the various states are on ballot access, and suggested that the more lenient states have little trouble with their lenient policy.

Toner also suggested that the Commission on Presidential Debates ought to lower the requirements for entry into the presidential debates, from 15% in national polls, to either 5% or 10% in such polls.

Toner is one of the three Republicans on the Federal Election Commission. Thanks to Nancy Ross for this news.