Will Governor Schwarzenegger Sign Anti-Electoral College Bill?

The California legislature passed AB 2948 on August 30. This is the “National Popular Vote Plan”, which would provide for an interstate pact. The pact would go into effect when states containing a majority of the electoral college had passed it. States participating in the pact would agree to appoint presidential electors pledged to the presidential candidate who got the most popular votes nationwide.

Suspense is building, as to whether California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger will sign the bill. He has given no hints so far. He need not decide until September 30.

For anyone who wishes to communicate with the Governor’s office, www.govmail.ca.gov, or fax 916-445-4633, or phone 916-445-2841.

Libertarian Party is the Only Party on the Ballot in Both Elections for the DeLay Seat

On November 7, Texas voters in the 22nd U.S. House district will see two races for that seat on their ballot. One is the regular term, and one is the special election for the two-month term for the remainder of this year. Oddly, the special election ballot will list no Democrat; the regular election will list no Republican; but both elections will list Bob Smither, the Libertarian. Democrat Nick Lampson refuses to run for the two-month term, and so the two-month term ballot will include 4 Republicans and Smither.

Colorado Supreme Court Won't Hear Libertarian Appeal

On September 1, the Colorado Supreme Court refused to hear Colorado Libertarian Party v Doty. This action by the Supreme Court is shameful. Colorado law permits qualified major parties to nominate people who have not been members of that party for an entire year. But Colorado law denies this right to qualified minor parties. There is no principle of law, and no principle of political philosophy or political science, that justifies such discrimination.

The lower state court had upheld the discriminatory treatment, based on a Colorado Supreme Court decision in 1991, but that case involved an unqualified political party, not a qualified party (even the 1991 precedent is unsupported by any philosophical or theoretical foundation).

This is the second court action recently (the first was from Pennsylvania) that says qualified minor parties are subject to ballot access burdens that qualified major parties are not subject to. Both lawsuits need to be placed before the U.S. Supreme Court. Once a state has recognized that a party has enough voter support to meet the state’s own definition of “party”, then all such parties should enjoy the same right of association.

Colorado Supreme Court Won’t Hear Libertarian Appeal

On September 1, the Colorado Supreme Court refused to hear Colorado Libertarian Party v Doty. This action by the Supreme Court is shameful. Colorado law permits qualified major parties to nominate people who have not been members of that party for an entire year. But Colorado law denies this right to qualified minor parties. There is no principle of law, and no principle of political philosophy or political science, that justifies such discrimination.

The lower state court had upheld the discriminatory treatment, based on a Colorado Supreme Court decision in 1991, but that case involved an unqualified political party, not a qualified party (even the 1991 precedent is unsupported by any philosophical or theoretical foundation).

This is the second court action recently (the first was from Pennsylvania) that says qualified minor parties are subject to ballot access burdens that qualified major parties are not subject to. Both lawsuits need to be placed before the U.S. Supreme Court. Once a state has recognized that a party has enough voter support to meet the state’s own definition of “party”, then all such parties should enjoy the same right of association.

Ohio Curbs on Voter Registration Enjoined

On September 1, a U.S. District Court in Cleveland enjoined Ohio from enforcing certain laws relating to voter registration. Project Vote v Blackwell, 1:06cv-1628. The judge was Kathleen O’Malley, a Clinton appointee. The law, passed in 2005, made it illegal for groups that conduct voter registration drives to submit completed voter registration forms as a package. Instead, each individual volunteer in that organization had to submit his or her forms personally to the county elections office. The law also required registration volunteers to compete a training course on their home computer, which made it impossible for people without computers to participate.