Ohio Congressional Independent Removed from Ballot because he Voted in Republican Primary

On July 14, at the last possible hour, Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell removed Charlie Morrison from the November ballot. Morrison had qualified as an independent candidate for U.S. House in the 15th district (the district now represented by Republican Deborah Pryce). His petition had been verified.

However, he was challenged because he had voted in the Republican primary earlier this year. Ohio state law does not say independent candidates must not have voted in a party primary. Section 3513.04 only says they must not have run for office in a party primary.

Ohio is a state in which the voter registration form does not ask voters to indicate party affiliation. However, Ohio elections officials keep a record of which party’s primary ballot a voter chooses. Morrison was running on a platform of cutting federal spending, and most political observers felt his candidacy was more damaging to the Republican incumbent member of Congress, than to the Democratic nominee.

When a candidate is challenged, the local Boards of Election vote. In Morrison’s case, the two Republican Board members voted to remove him, and the two Democratic members voted to retain him. The law provides that in case of a tie, the Secretary of State shall decide. Morrison will sue.

Labor Party Turns in South Carolina Petition

On July 11, the Labor Party turned in 16,500 signatures to the South Carolina Election Commission. If 10,000 are valid, the Labor Party will be ballot-qualified for elections in 2007 and beyond. Although the Labor Party has existed nationally since 1990, never before had it tried to qualify for the ballot in any state.

Also, the Working Families Party petition in South Carolina has now been checked, and the Working Families Party is now ballot-qualified. It is not clear if the WFP will seek to run any candidates in South Carolina this year.

Constitution Party Wins Nevada Ballot Access Case

On July 13, a Nevada state district court in Las Vegas ordered that Lance Hinton should be placed on the November ballot as the Constitution (Independent American) Party candidate for Clark County Treasurer. The case is Indp. Amer. Party v Lomax, A522324.

Clark County election officials had refused to put Hinton on the ballot because they said he isn’t validly registered to vote. Hinton had registered to vote, but he had refused to provide his Social Security Number. Elections officials had claimed that state law requires either the last 4 digits or the Social Security number, or the individual’s drivers license number. However, state law says if an individual does not furnish either of these numbers, he or she may instead submit an affidavit of identity, signed under penalty of perjury. Hinton submitted such an affidavit but Clark County elections officials rejected it, claiming it wasn’t good enough.

New Jersey Minor Parties to Sue Over Various Discriminatory Election Laws

The first week in August, the New Jersey Green, Libertarian and Conservative Parties will file a constitutional lawsuit in state court. The lawsuit will challenge a law that makes it illegal for petitioners to circulate a petition for a candidate for district or county office, if the petitioners don’t live in that district or county.

The lawsuit will also challenge the failure of New Jersey elections officials to tally how many voters register as members of the Conservative Party (the other parties in the lawsuit already won that right years ago, but the state won’t extend that right to any parties other than the ones that won the old registration lawsuit in 1999).

Finally, the lawsuit will challenge election laws that make it easier for the Republican and Democratic Parties to raise and spend money, than any other parties; and the make it easier for the two major parties to lobby the legislature, than for other parties to do so.

U.S. House Extends Voting Rights Act

On July 13, the U.S. House of Representatives defeated various amendments to alter the Voting Rights Act, which was passed in 1965 and must be renewed every 15 years or so (it expires in 2007). Then, the House re-enacted the law without any significant changes. The bill is HR 9.

The Voting Rights Act has been very useful for protecting the voting rights of ethnic and foreign language minorities, but it has been of almost no use in protecting voters who desire to vote for minor parties and independent candidates.